Wrolf

For the third time in two days I am composing an email to you, the first two
I have deleted.  I do not want to piss anyone off as I see good and bad in
both sides of the argument (yours and Dan's).  I also like the honesty in
your recent posts.  However...

IMNSHO, I think you should spend time away from the keyboard and go diving
(i.e. STFU).  Moreover, use your Nitrox qualification and go forward (only
if you want), in your diving.  Gain more experience of accelerated deco and
perhaps Trimix.  When you have done this maybe you could ask some more open
questions and perhaps provide advice yourself to people.  At the moment I
perceive you are debating for intellectual fulfilment alone.

I recognise that there is some worth in your intellectual debates but these
are best suited on other lists.  Go there.

All the best in your diving.

David Shimell
Project Manager, Sequent Computer Systems Ltd., Weybridge, Surrey, UK.
Email: shimell@se*.co* <mailto:shimell@se*.co*> 

-----Original Message-----
From:	Wrolf Courtney [SMTP:wrolf@co*.ne*]
Sent:	Thursday, August 27, 1998 2:48 PM
To:	techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject:	Re: The noise level and misdirection

At 11:12 AM 25/08/1998 -0400, Wrolf Courtney wrote:
> bdi wrote:
> Wrolf, in your last little diatribe, you wrote

> >But you ripped me once.  Don't expect sympathy if you do 
> >not at least come up with, say, "Dive Facilities where 
> >IWR is practiced, with full surface supplied gasses and 
> >support, in Australia."

> I am interested in your suggestion that I ripped
> you once. This implies I either dudded you in some
> financial arrangement or stole from you or copied
> something from you and claimed it as my own.

> Would you care top enlarge on this so I can understand
> what it is you are accusing me of?

> thank you.

 rgrds     billyw

It was a silly, rhetorical statement of mine.
I had proposed that as payment for me answering a whole slew of 
your questions, ouwrite something interesting and useful yourself.  
I later added in the offer of stating what kind of an engineer I 
was, back when I was a lot less up to speed on the definition of 
engineer, and believed that software engineer and network engineer, 
and in fact almost any kind of computer scientist, was an engineer.

At least, I think that was the sequence.  Something like that.

I took one of your comments as a go ahead, so I did.
Then, it seemed, you wouldn't.  I felt a bit robbed.
--
Wrolf

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]