Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: wreckdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: Multiple recipients of list wreckdiver <wreckdiver@wreckdiver.com>
From: GarlooEnt <GarlooEnt@ao*.co*>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:31:51 EST
Subject: Re:Tragic Technicaldiving
Subj:	Re: Tragic Technicaldiving
Date:	03/04/98
To:	Raimo4252@ao*.co*

bob
i never said being fit was wrong - i was questioning the approach & the levels
that dan was recomending as well as taking the attiitude that if one did not
fit into his mold of being okay then they are out. 
you & i know quite a few better that average tech divers that on appearance
would not be "acceptable". 
that is where i disagree.
hank


 
In a message dated 98-03-04 08:03:14 EST, you write:

<< Subj:	 Re: Tragic Technicaldiving
 Date:	98-03-04 08:03:14 EST
 From:	Raimo4252@ao*.co* (Raimo4252)
 To:	dlv@ga*.ne*, GarlooEnt@ao*.co*, Wahoojan@ao*.co*, Wahoo2001@ao*.co*,
CAPTZEROOO@ao*.co*
 CC:	techdiver@aq*.co*, wreckdiver@wreckdiver.com, Ussfriel@ao*.co*
 
 In a message dated 98-03-03 17:42:45 EST, dlv@ga*.ne* writes:
 
 << 
  Your wrong about this. It is my concern for lives of these people that has
  caused me to take the LARGE amount of time I've spent, to address this
  subject-----the fitness issue should not be "fought" by the "physically
  challenged" as you call them, instead, they should seek out a top notch
  personal trainer and try to attain a higher level of fitness. This will make
  them safer and better qualified, physiologically, for tech diving, and make
  them healthier in ther general life. And the tech diving, can be the "Goal",
  and the "reason", that these people will finally pursue fitness, ultimately
  to benefit in their everyday life.
  I can't believe you are giving me this "perfect specimen" crap.  A tech
  diver needs to develop many facets. Fitness alone ( no training, no skills,
  wrong mind set, bad gear)  would make a dangerously bad diver. This is so
  obvious I should not have to comment on it.  But I'll say this one more
  time. A tech diver, and particularly a tech instructor, needs a high level
  of fitness, in the same way a college student needs to be able to read. And
  the better he can read, the greater his chances of succeeding in
  college-----as opposed to the person who slides through high school, barely
  able to read at all, and perhaps reading with lips moving, a testiment to
  poor reading skills.  But reading skills alone will NOT make the college
  student  go to the head of the class----without diligent study, reasonably
  good IQ, aptitude in the classes taken, good instructors, and desire to
  learn as much as possible, reading skills alone will be of little value.
  Fitness  for a tech diver is very similar.  Its "our" reading skill.
  Without fitness, you will never be a good tech or cave diver for extreme
  depth or duration diving. Your gas exchange rate will be far to great a
  liability to you---this including the processing of CO2 from whatever
  exertion you become subjected to, and the offgassing of nitrogen and
  helium......and even the actual gas consumption itself, since the ultra fit
  can learn to lower their heart rates to 45 or 50 bpm while scootering on a
  deep dive, and use a very small amount of gas, which also means ingassing
  less for the duration at depth.  But again, fitness is ONLY the entry level
  prereq skill here----the tech diver needs brains, motivation, a good
  instructor, the right attitude, and a lot more. And if you were to decree
  that all obese tech diver candidates were "fit" for tech diving, as is,
  you'd be opening up college to the "illiterate", or worse. >>
 
 I agree here with Dan. Fitness in tech diving is very important, and some
 level of fitness should be expected of participants for this type of diving.
 No need to be Mark Spitz though, just in shape for the dives being performed.
 
 Safe diving, Raimo
 --
 Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aq*.co*'.
 Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aq*.co*'.
 
 
 ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
 Return-Path: <owner-techdiver@aq*.co*>
 Received: from  relay20.mail.aol.com (relay20.mail.aol.com [172.31.106.66])
by air16.mail.aol.com (v40.2) with SMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 1998 08:03:13 -0500
 Received: from bighorn.terra.net (bighorn.terra.net [199.103.128.2])
 	  by relay20.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
 	  with ESMTP id IAA00285;
 	  Wed, 4 Mar 1998 08:03:00 -0500 (EST)
 Received: (mail@lo*) 
 	by bighorn.terra.net (8.8.6/jr3.9) for 
 	id HAA11472; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 07:56:59 -0500
 Precedence: bulk
 Errors-To: owner-techdiver@aq*.co*
 Received: from bighorn.terra.net (root@lo*) 
 	by bighorn.terra.net (8.8.6/jr3.9) with EXEC for techdiver
 	id XAA26070; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:04:51 -0500
 Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.34]) 
 	by bighorn.terra.net (8.8.6/jr3.8) with ESMTP for <techdiver@aq*.co*>
 	id XAA26062; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:04:51 -0500
 Received: from Raimo4252@ao*.co*
 	by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv13.ems) id 7UXVa04318;
 	Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:03:25 -0500 (EST)
 From: Raimo4252 <Raimo4252@ao*.co*>
 Message-ID: <b8a30fc.34fcd28f@ao*.co*>
 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:03:25 EST
 To: dlv@ga*.ne*, GarlooEnt@ao*.co*, Wahoojan@ao*.co*, Wahoo2001@ao*.co*,
         CAPTZEROOO@ao*.co*
 Cc: techdiver@aq*.co*, wreckdiver@wreckdiver.com, Ussfriel@ao*.co*
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Subject: Re: Tragic Technicaldiving
 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
 X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 64
 
  >>

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]