Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: wreckdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 14:29:57 +1100
To: Jim Cobb <cobber@mi*.co*>
From: anscott@hi*.ne*.au*
Subject: Re: duplicate messages on several Lists
Cc: wreckdiver@wreckdiver.com
Sounds Great to me Jim, once you guys have finished removing all the pipes,
lead, and other bits of steel then some real wreckers can moove in and you
guys will have made it easier for us to find things WORTH taking.BTW the
logic of leaving pipes etc behind is that others can enjoy the wreck, most
divers -you included by the sounds of things, don't ever notice anything
small on a wreck and for them the 'big picture' ie, engine., hull, prop,
boiler etc are what they like to see. Most people are usually too narked or
blind to ever find anything smaller than a piece of pipe:)) 
Good Luck with your ratting,
Scott

At 22:24 29/01/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Well, this sure is some swiss-cheese logic. So what you are saying is go 
>ahead and strip a wreck of everything of value and leave the worthless 
>stuff to greenie divers? Hmmmm, actually this idea does deserve some 
>serious consideration. 
>
>NOW HEAR THIS- Alright all you nogood worthless strokeass shavetail 
>PUKES! If any of you greenassholes find anything of value, ANYTHING, you 
>are to mark it with a float and immediately turn it over to the guy on 
>the boat with the most fucking dives! If you don't like it FUCK YOU and 
>go find your own fucking wrecks!
>
>I'll tell you what, Scott. I and a few other guys know of a couple of 
>wrecks off of Virgina Beach here which nobody else knows about. And what 
>we are going to do is STRIP THEM BARE. And just to annoy you I am going 
>to bring up some worthless scraps of metal, just in case someone stumbles 
>across it. Normally, we let the loosers get after the wreck after we've 
>given it a good working over. But now that I know that folks are 
>complaining out there, I guess it would be far better for their delicate 
>sensibilities to just not let anyone know the wrecks location. This way 
>we get our junk, and no ones feelings will get hurt.
>
>Does this sound like a fair deal?
>
>>Jim ,
>>My point was that other conservation minded divers and the general public
>>may be convinced of the value of removing a porthole , plate, gold etc from
>>a wreck but really, a piece of pipe??? I often hear greenie divers
>>complaining about wreckers destroying wrecks for the sake of it and this is
>>a prime example. If you cant find anything decent to take then for Gods sake
>>leave that sort of shit behind. If thats the sort of relic your looking for
>>stick to scuttled hulks and take all you want. Perhaps when you have a few
>>more pieces of pipe you may raise your standards a little. I personally
>>wouldnt bother with a porthole, or any other large piece of machinery
>>anymore, I believe personal belongings and unique items are much more
>>interesting and a challenge to find. Any stroke can find a porthole, or
>>piece of pipe, if theres one there to be found,.
>>Scott
>
>






+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Please send messages for the WreckDiver list to:  wreckdiver@wreckdiver.com
Send subscription and help requests to:   wreckdiver-request@wreckdiver.com
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]