Frank wrote: MW> There is nothing wrong with placing your own safety limits and MW> abiding by them, just don't push your limits on me. FT>I would never do that, but I do think conservative guidelines -- *and* the FT>rationale behind them -- are important for those divers not yet experienced FT>enough to set their own. FT>-frank And Rich Said: RP>Although I am in favor of advocating a PO2 limit of 1.4ATM, I am NOT a big RP>fan of "standards". This is another pet-peeve of mine, so I'll do my best RP>not to let this get out of hand.... RP>Let's all get one thing clear: Standards have VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH RP>SAFETY!!! Many people have the false impression that creating standards RP>will somehow decrease the probability of a person getting hurt or killed. RP>Knowledge and training, NOT STANDARDS, are what decrease that probability RP>(my definition of "training" includes much more than the forums that RP>invole instructors and the exchange of money). RP>Aloha, RP>Rich I don't want to sound like I am picking a fight, I am not. My concern boils down to a fear that todays standards are tomorrows Dive Shop & Dive Training Mandates, ". . . sorry son we can't fill that mix because you haven't taken our `Trimix PpO2 course' yet, it's number 57 in the Trimix series of which you need to take ALL of them in order to get fills anywhere! And they're only $495 each!" I know, maybe I'm being a worry wart but I remember taking my Nitrox course a few years ago, It took several days and covered EVERY aspect of Nitrox planning and usage, now some clowns don't want to fill O2 bottles or 50/50 for me because my OLD card doesn't say TECHNICAL NITROX. Not that I can't do it myself (necessity is the mother of homebrew), but I don't need that hassle. MRWConsult@ex*.co* /\/\/ --- � DeLuxe� 1.25 #11829 � Silly Humans . . .
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]