The more I read the accident report the less sense it makes. The 60 min Deco obligation cannot be figured no matter how you look at it. The strange use of the rebreather, the "disabling" of the "aftermarket" changes. This whole thing stinks to high-heaven of a typical dive industry cover-up with, once again, IANTD right in the middle. All you people out there who are considering a rebreather with IANTD training should look at this incident very carefully, I suspect we have not heard the last of it. But based on this story the problem was too much air in the drysuit, a seemingly unsolvable issue with 2 "expert" divers. The answer to your question is to deal with the problem and not go to the surface. But to be frank, I don't believe this story. On Monday, July 2, 2001 4:21 PM, Mcglynn@ao*.co* wrote: >Based upon what we have heard about this accident. What could the buddy do >to help without violating her deco obligation? >I want to know for future knowledge. It would be helpful. >Thanks >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]