Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: david@la*.St*.ED* (Peter R. David)
Subject: Re: Diver emergency aids/signals
From: gdawe@we*.co* (Greg Dawe)
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 12:56:41 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> 	Han Weegink is correct- In the U.S., and I believe most foreign
> carriers, it is HIGHLY illegal to carry explosive devices or combustibles
> onto aircraft.  
> 
> 	Apparently, there are also non-obvious effects, like rapid
> repressurization of devices like flares that can cause them to 
> autoignite-over and above the obvious problems of having ignition
> devices near thousands of kilos of petroleum...
> 
> 	Peter David

As it should be.  The term "offshore diving" in my original posting was meant
to refer to dives that are greater than, say, 1 mile from shore.  I did not 
mean to infer a trip abroad.  Perhaps the terms "offshore wreck" and "inshore 
wreck" are colloquial expressions particular to New England?  Wrecks like the 
Chester Polling, the Chelsea, and perhaps the Coyote are considered "inshore 
dives". Wrecks like the Andrea Doria, the Coimbra, the Texas Tower, or the USS
San Diego are considered offshore dives.

Nobody wants to be blown-off an offshore wreck at depth, initiate decompression
while drifting in the current, and surface miles away from the moored dive 
boat.  Obviously having flares available for signalling is a definate plus.

I'm sorry for the confusion - I was certainly not advocating putting flares 
in luggage to be checked-in on an aircraft.

Safe Diving,
GregD

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]