Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
The next thing we have to work on is a way to get the agencies to embrace hyperoxic trimix, and get it into the hands of advanced level recreational divers. I have been turning people on to HOTx for 6 months, but there are several problems: Most people are charging .65 to .75 a foot for He, which is ludicrous, since the cost is a round .13 a foot. The typical reasons are "because I have to buy a compressor" blah, blah, blah. As a parallel, one of my buds has an office supply biz. He has two copiers that cost more than any compressor, and he gets a nickel a copy off one, and .25 a copy from the other. Others sell double fills of trimix for 80 to 120 dollars. We can double the money on our gas at $16 for singles, and around $28 to $32 for most dubs. This rip off has to be brought to light as well. NO ONE should have to take $9,000 worth of TDI or IANTD training to be able to use the gas, which, in reality, is *safer* than air for diving. Without a trimix shingle, or a guy like me who will do a fill for people I know, they are unable to use the gas anywhere else, unless they blend it in their garage, which many are doing. I took a gent out yesterday to dive on the gas, and he was amazed at how much better he felt afterwards. Normally, his hands really hurt after diving air (slightly arthritic), but HOTx didn't have that effect. I brought this up to the "instructor base" over on rec.scuba, and they howled like a bunch of mashed cats. NAUI and IANTD totally missed the ball on this one with their "Normoxic trimix course", which is just another way to separate you from your money. Before anyone starts screaming, lets just remember the noise made when Nitrox was suggested for recreational divers. Mountains of dead divers were predicted... Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: Trey <trey@ne*.co*> To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; Mike Strong <divermike@fn*.ne*> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:09 PM Subject: Re: clarification was: An the beat goes on and on > If all of us insist that these guys do things properly , then they will find > a way to do that. > > The problem is that when idiots like Gilliam get into the mix, we all > suffer. I can't imagine traveling 12,000 miles to dive in a great spot and > doing it on air. > > We have the same problem in New Jersey, where the Seeker idiots proudly dive > air and bullshit gear, like "poney" bottles of air with air in doubles > just to be sure there is no mistake about how dumb they are) with > slobwinders to turn the ponies on. They serve a clientele of strokes. > > The harder we make it for the idiots to be idiots, the better it will be for > all of us. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Strong <divermike@fn*.ne*> > To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com> > Cc: <trey@ne*.co*> > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 3:37 PM > Subject: clarification was: An the beat goes on and on > > > > List: > > > > There has been some confusion about my views, and what I did or did not > say > > regarding a Truk Lagoon Trip. Most of these messages were in the private > > forum, but I want to say all this in the open. > > > > I DO NOT support any form of deep air diving, diving below 130' without > > Helium, or any diving operation involved with Brett Gilliam, TDI, or any > of > > his buddies. The shop I work for is taking a trip to Truk, on the boat > > Odyssey. This vessel, at the encouraging of Bret Gilliam, allows *and* > > supports Deep air diving to depths of 200, because Gilliam says in the > > ocean you are safe to that depth. I DO NOT agree. It is very clear that > > this guy is a moron, and the charter company is falling victim to his > > stupidity. > > > > As for the trip, I have suggested to several members of the trip that the > > answer is to limit the diving on the trip to depths of 130 or shallower, > or > > not go at all. (Helium, which is available, is *very* expensive, so my > > thinking is that it makes more sense to not do the deep dives, rather than > > to pay for the He) As for the other suggestions on the list regarding > > "diving to 140 or 150, mabey the 200 foot dive...," in Truk, I also DO NOT > > agree with this. This is the exact thing we all are trying to get away > > from, It is not safe, nor is it "OK," to do these dives without the use of > > Helium. > > > > I am a firm supporter of the DIR idea and those who have put in the time > > and effort to make it work--If you want to do it DIR in Truk, you have 3 > > choices: Pay for the gas, stay above 130, or refer to Rule #1. Most, I > > would think would refer to Rule #1........ > > > > Finally, I would like to point out that it is up to us as divers to get > the > > point across to these charters....deep air is not safe. I hope this post > > has cleared up this mess, and that everyone knows where I stand now. > > > > Best, > > > > Mike Strong > > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]