Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Come on, Trey! You're saying I didn't ask nice enough? The fact is that when people ask questions like this you more often reply with insults than with information. Before I risk my life following a certain model, I need some more information. I don't think that's unreasonable. As far as the archives go, since the ratio of posts with information to posts that are just insults is about 1%, it's really hard to FIND the part where you "explain it all". So I ask again, did you guys actually study this? Do you have numbers to back it up? May I see them please? Not nice enough for you? OK. May I see them PRETTY PLEASE? Come on, this list is not about being nice, you set the tone yourself! It's about not killing yourself under water. BTW, I have no plans on doing the kinds of dives you do. However, I'd still like to do the dives I do with as much safety as possible. Getting in your face is not on my list, I've got better things to do. I am simply asking for info. (This post will probably just result in another barrage of insults). Cheers! Trey wrote: ~ >OFF GASSING > > You see, this is EXACTLY why I hate dealing with idiots: you have no clue , >but want to get in my face. The fact is, and this goes for the idiot "guy" >and the other punk, low ox breaks are a necessary part of efficient >OFFGASSING while they are merely advertised as a method of reducing >pulmonary toxicity and damage, and are necessary throughout the >decompresion, not just during the oxygen phase - they REDUCE the >decomprssion time, genius, the IMPROVE the offgassing results, and they are >therefore not counted as no deco time like the idiots morons told you . I >will NOT tell you why, after this bullshit. > >I have been over and over the entire reasoning , logic and physiology of >this in several articles and posts, but you don't believe me, you instead >believe some roofer dive instructor or dyslexic moron who does no diving >instead of me. Do not expect me to waste five seconds now doing it again at >your "demand". > >I will say that successful decompression uses a combination of models and >theories combined with an understanding of physiology and practical >experience to explain or "validate" what we have come to find works. I will >not waste my time on here after being attacked by blubbering goobs and nasty >little idiots . I'll save the good information for those who approach me >properly. > >You tell me, or should I say I "demand" that you show me the last time you >did 7 hours at 300 feet and decompressed out in 8.5 hours with perfect >results, and have the Doppler and blood test to prove it, asshole. Then >let's "compare notes". > > >Trey wrote: > >> lets talk about what WORKS, and >>what does not. > >OK, let's! > >How is it that the air breaks are not accounted for. I'd like some >evidence that this does not make any difference, before I risk >getting bent. I'd like to see actual dive profiles, % incidences of >the bends, doppler results etc. I know you have a ton of experience, >but would you base something like this on something that someone >said, or would you demand some evidence? In the end it's not theory, >it's your body. > >Thanks. > >-- >Paul Braunbehrens mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co* >http://www.daw-mac.com Mailing list for digital audio on the mac -- Paul Braunbehrens mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co* http://www.daw-mac.com Mailing list for digital audio on the mac -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]