Bill Wolk wrote:
>
>The Buhlmann model is the best we have, but it's not perfect. It doesn't
>take into account blood plasma transport of O2 -- among other things. In
>that regard, it more closely models deco using 80/20 than 100% O2 which
>means that I get out of the water with an extra margin of safety using
>100% 02


Bill, thank you for an informative and intelligent discussion.  I 
wish there was more of it on this list.

Your argument makes a lot of sense, it would be nice to see how this 
additional advantage (blood plasma transport of O2) offsets the 
disadvantage of the air breaks.  While all the theories are just 
that, I feel a little uncomfortable with the idea of using O2 for a 
shorter time than specified by the algorithms due to O2 breaks.  Afer 
all, those algorithms are what we have to use, I'm not going to 
blatantly disregard them.  Ideally, the algorithms would take into 
account the blood plasma O2 effect.

Cheers,

-- 
Paul Braunbehrens mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co*
http://www.daw-mac.com Mailing list for digital audio on the mac
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]