Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 23:52:59 -0400
From: Guy Morin <xnet@vi*.ca*>
Subject: Re: 80/20 nonsense
To: Trey <trey@ne*.co*>
Cc: techdiver@Aquanaut.Com

--Boundary_(ID_D7uSmuGR1dpn6Elxvek4wg)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Trey,

Thank you for considering the post. My regrets on your lack of courage.
18000 ft penetrations, no problem, but in affirming that 50/100 is an
optimal
logistical choice that offers equivocal decompression risks/benefits as
36/80: no can do?


> Look, you have no track  record, no experience, and no information.
You take
> what IANTD told you as the gospel. I do not have time to waste on you
, as :
> 1)  you do not need the info, 2), you would not even get it if I told
you.

You can't ignore the voice of reason, no matter who speaks it. Face the
issue here and now. You can turn this into a big win, but you are going
to have to risk.


> Also, he WKPP is not here to keep you entertained, informed, or happy.
We
> have done what you are speculating about for the past 14 years.

But you are entertaining me, and many others. These oversights of yours
aren't
going to slip under the rug, not after the feces you people have
disturbed.

Ante up buddy, you of all people should know you stand only to gain
here.

You need to be a leader here. There are many examples to follow. Intel
with
the Pentium fiasco, that was a public relation's disaster that wasn't
repeated
when the antitrust probes were conducted by the Government. Microsoft is

learning that painful lesson.

People won't be fooled, not for long. Your pitting yourself against
people's
common sense, that is a formidable adversary, are you really sure you
can
bluff your way out of this? Is this really the best tactic?


> Now, go back to your Tom Mouth workbook, and then tell me why Mouth
uses
> 80/20 in the ocean, and 100%   when cave diving ( per one of his most
recent
> post to rebreather list)  ???? Start with that as your homework
assignment.

Now, now, temper. That was a very conciliatory gesture, and I would be
careful
as to how far to read into that one.

> By the way, Jarrod's deco list explains his whole deco program and has
its
> authors on line for guys like you who want to jerk people around.
You'll get
> nothing from me.

Too bad, your loss. It's not me you should be worrying about.

--
Guy



--Boundary_(ID_D7uSmuGR1dpn6Elxvek4wg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Trey,
<p>Thank you for considering the post. My regrets on your lack of courage.
<br>18000 ft penetrations, no problem, but in affirming that 50/100 is
an optimal
<br>logistical choice that offers equivocal decompression risks/benefits
as
<br>36/80: no can do?
<br> 
<p>> Look, you have no track  record, no experience, and no information.
You take
<br>> what IANTD told you as the gospel. I do not have time to waste on
you , as :
<br>> 1)  you do not need the info, 2), you would not even get it
if I told you.
<p>You can't ignore the voice of reason, no matter who speaks it. Face
the
<br>issue here and now. You can turn this into a big win, but you are going
<br>to have to risk.
<br> 
<p>> Also, he WKPP is not here to keep you entertained, informed, or happy.
We
<br>> have done what you are speculating about for the past 14 years.
<p>But you are entertaining me, and many others. These oversights of yours
aren't
<br>going to slip under the rug, not after the feces you people have
disturbed.
<p>Ante up buddy, you of all people should know you stand only to gain
here.
<p>You need to be a leader here. There are many examples to follow. Intel
with
<br>the Pentium fiasco, that was a public relation's disaster that wasn't
repeated
<br>when the antitrust probes were conducted by the
Government. Microsoft
is
<br>learning that painful lesson.
<p>People won't be fooled, not for long. Your pitting yourself against
people's
<br>common sense, that is a formidable adversary, are you really sure you
can
<br>bluff your way out of this? Is this really the best tactic?
<br> 
<p>> Now, go back to your Tom Mouth workbook, and then tell me why Mouth
uses
<br>> 80/20 in the ocean, and 100%   when cave diving ( per one
of his most recent
<br>> post to rebreather list)  ???? Start with that as your homework
assignment.
<p>Now, now, temper. That was a very conciliatory gesture, and I would
be careful
<br>as to how far to read into that one.
<p>> By the way, Jarrod's deco list explains his whole deco program and
has its
<br>> authors on line for guys like you who want to jerk people around.
You'll get
<br>> nothing from me.
<p>Too bad, your loss. It's not me you should be worrying about.
<pre>-- 
Guy</pre>
 </html>

--Boundary_(ID_D7uSmuGR1dpn6Elxvek4wg)--
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]