Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Re: A Call to Arms
To: KybrSose@ao*.co*
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 09:58:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: zimmmt@au*.al*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
From: zimmmt@au*.al*.co* (Mike Zimmerman)
> water training as part of every tech type class, with the exception of basic
> nitrox right?. anything less is a violation of standards by the instructor,
> isn't it?? .

Could well be.  However as you cannot guarantee they will follow
the standards, again I say this is why the student has to have
a role and responsibility (for better OR worse) in determining
if they are ready for whatever the dive is.

>   You make a damaging admission here Mike, in your use of the term diver.  I
> am in total agreement with you, when the instructional setting is removed from
> the equation Mike. 

Hell maybe I'm just too independent, I just don't believe in transferring
all that responsibility to an instructor.  He doesn't make enuf  to
make it worthwhile :-)  And I simply don't get off on the idea of
abandoning my life to the care of someone else.  I'd still like to
have a say in it.

>   But thats not what we were discussing. We were discussing students and
> instructors. Dan Volker has pointed out, in the USA and elsewhere I suspect,
> the instructor is assumed to be all knowing. Its wise to shield yourself
> against incompetence with self education, but its not realistic to expect that
> all others will do the same successfully. 

But it is realistic to promote the idea.  As I said to Dan, people have a way
of living up to, or DOWN to, the expectations you set for them.  If we
proclaim its "ok" to be helpless, they will be that and feel good about
it.  If we instead proclaim that (to plagarize Rich Pyle) "every time
you go under water you take your butt in your own hands", then
ya know more and more people MIGHT start acting that way.

>   You educate them Mike. Thats why its called Instruction, and it works when
> its done right. You seem to be well aware of what you are doing, why is that?
> Didn't the various instructors you've had have something to do with that?? 

Actually I had that attitude from the beginning, in fact my OW1 instructor
was rather mediocre.  Adequate certainly, but does not compare to some
stellar instructors I have found since.  Going from OW1 I went straight
to AOW a year and zero dives later.  I had moved to grad school, talked
to the AOW instructor, did one dive with him, and embarassed myself royally
on the shallow water eval dive.

So I joined a club and dove at least once per week with the club (outside the
class) so I'd have water time to practice the skills I needed for the course.
Of course this is the same attitude that Jammer thinks makes me such
a bad apprentice, but I quickly became a tough student to kill.  Its
worked for me, I'll stick with it.

>  Okay Okay i concede the example thing, please no fred, no fred........

Fred... Fred....

Ok, if the partial pressure of students in the class......  :-)

>    Thats outside the box Mike. 

Hell Al, I like being outside the box :-)

> I am not saying instructors can save all the idiots from themselves

good.  that's why I am saying we need more tools in the fight against
accidents.  Raising the expectation bar for all divers is one of them IMO.

>    I don't mean to minimize the role of the student, but I am afraid of
> minimizing the role of the instructor.  If we can agree not to do both I can
> live with it. 

Looking at this as the mouse and the trap, I have been pushing the mouse
so hard because I think we have totally been focusing on the trap
(and removing them all).  I _do_ think if the mice are smart enuf,
you don't have to worry about the traps.   And no, they won't ever
ALL be smart enuf, but if a lot of them improve that can't
be a bad thing.

Hey, its not fun or popular to take an accident and find faults with
someone who paid for those faults with their life, regardless of
how much those faults did or did not contribute to the overall 
accident, but who are we helping by ignoring them?

The people to help are the ones who are still here, still diving
and possibly doing the same things that led or contributed to
accidents that have already occured.  Telling them it is always
the fault of the instructor or the gear doesn't tell them alot.
It gives them a false sense of security, that they can mail order
DIR gear, find an approved instructor and nothing will ever
happen to them.   Good start as that may be, its not enuf
if they aren't thinking.  We have to reverse this trend
of telling divers its so safe they don't have to think.  There
is NOTHING good to come out of following that path.

I'm simply arguing that point all.  Not to the illegitimacy of
other points, just on its own merits.

Regards,
Mike


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]