Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 18:17:33 -0400
From: Tom Fuhs <TomFuhs@wo*.at*.ne*>
To: "techdiver@aquanaut.com" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: PA Quarry Near Drowning - Deep Air the culprit???
I just read the thread on O2 narcosis in the archives.  This was never
mentioned in my nitrox course.  The course stressed that a major benefit
of nitrox was a reduced level of narcosis.  In fact the equivalent air
depth , based on N2 content alone, was the "only" consideration for
predicting narcosis of a nitrox breathing mixture at a given depth. 
This was an "ANDI Complete SafeAir user" course,  advertised to give you
everthing you need to know to use nitrox mixtures up to 50%. I took the
course a little over 4 years ago.

Now granted, this was just a nitrox course, nothing fancy.  But I feel
like maybe I was short-changed.  I figure one of two things occured: 
1) they didn't know, or
2) they didn't bother to tell me in the interests of promoting nitrox
and selling me more gas.

I'm beginnig to understand the frustrations some seem to have with the
tech agency infrastructure.  This wasn't really a tech course.  But what
if I do take a tech/mix course.  What interesting bit of info would get
lost during the hard sell.  

Thanks
	-tom



Kevin Connell wrote:
> 
> It is thought that PP02's in the 1.4 range have the same or greater
> narcotic potential than PPN2 of 4.0, so adding oxygen may not reduce, and
> may actually increase narcosis.
> 
> I learned this in a PADI Nitrox Diver course.
> 
> At 02:35 PM 7/20/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >Mike Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> >>  We've had the discussions
> >> before about nitrox not being less narcotic than air.  This
> >> looks like "deep air".
> >>
> >
> >Huh?
> >Could someone please explain this?  This is the second time I've heard
> >reference to air being less narcotic than nitrox.  (George Irvine made
> >mention of it saying that air was less narcotic than 30% at 130')  This
> >goes against everything I learned and goes against what seems to me to
> >be intutitivly obvious; ie: less PP N2 = less narcotic effect.  I must
> >have missed the thread discussing this, or maybe I'm missing something
> >real basic.  Anyway, being an average NE wreck diver (70 - 130 FSW) and
> >generally breathing Nitrox on these dives, I'm curious as to what the
> >thinking is here.  Just trying to learn.
> >
> >       -tom
> >--
> >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>
> 
> Northwest Labor Systems
> http://www.nwls.com
> Lake Stevens, WA
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]