Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "David Widen" <dwiden@in*.ne*>
To: "Techdiver (E-mail)" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: AIR II on a wing...Hogarthian or Not...?
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 06:56:30 -0400

I have a set of Dive-Rite Super Wings and do promarily wreck diving. With
people I have talked to and my own personal experience is:
*	Wreck - It is a much better inflator because of the volumet of air it can
ump into the BC especially at depth adn depth changes cna be greater in a
short period of time.
*	Cave - the smaller standard inflator has much smaller ports and has nit
fill as fast. This makes it better for caves

If you want the higher fill rate but are concerned about failure, SPro makes
a power inflater similiar to the AIR II without the 2ns stage stuff.

Safe Diving!

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Scubagator@ao*.co* [mailto:Scubagator@ao*.co*]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 1998 3:12 PM
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: AIR II on a wing...Hogarthian or Not...?


Hogarthian or not...we have been pondering this, and I have asked a few on
the
list already, there has been no real consensus either way.

Adding an AIR II to a wing...would it be considered an unnecessary failure
point?

Sean Cary
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]