Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <Robert.Lockard@nc*.na*.mi*>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 13:12:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Stuperwings
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com, Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>
Cc: "Tech Diver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
     


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Stuperwings
Author:  Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*> at Internet
Date:    3/12/98 9:15 AM


>Look, you knuckleheads who defend your stuperwings to the death, nobody 
>really cares what kind of useless equipment you guys care to torture 
>yourselves with.

You are still trying to get on my good side.  But not my type, I prefer 
Catholic girls.
     
>But just as sure as the sun rising in the east, once every couple of 
>months or so you guys start feeling insecure about your dumb purchase 
>and have to do a "what do you all think about stuperwings" post.

Never felt insecure about them.
     
>I wonder why this is? I mean if stuperwings are Gods Gift to Technical 
>Diving, they should stand on their own merits. But, no, you stuperwing 
>bondage dudes occationally look at your wild, convoluted mass of hoses, 
>tubeing, valves and other crap and start to have a creeping doubt that 
>maybe, just maybe, you got taked to the cleaners at the local dive 
>shop.

No, did not get taken to the cleaners.  
     
>Well, as my Dad is fond of saying, "you pays yer money and you makes 
>yer choice". So you bondage morons made your choice now shut the hell 
>up. Standard wings are one of those rare inventions which are perfect 
>in their execution. They cannot be improved upon beyond construction 
>details. To double them up and wrap them in tubing took a perfectly 
>good product and fucked it all up.

I did not start this conversation.  Only my 2 cents.  Your dad is a 
smart man.  My choice, agreed.  And 
     
>Stupid purchases like stuperwings are not always quantifiable in terms of 
>life or death. The diving experience is greatly enhanced by the fact that 
>you don't have to fuck with a 2nd hose and inflator, you don't have to 
>struggle to keep your balance and you don't have to burn as much air when 
>you use standard wings. 

I consider dry suits added task loading.  I don't have any problems with 
balance or trim.  That 2nd hose is clipped out of the way and in easy 
reach at all times.  Dove<sp> a set of DiveRite Original wings, loved 
them, perhaps I will use them when diving dry.  However; not getting rid 
of Superwings.
     
>I experience this every stinking dive since I got rid of mine. If you 
>morons can't get that through your thick, dualbladder encased skulls, 
>fine, I don't give a shit. Just dive your stuperwings and quit whining 
>about them.

I don't ever think you have heard me whining.  And yes, I do have a thick 
skull, I have to be convinced, not beaten into submission.  You will only 
find my skull getting thicker when you start pounding on it.

Robert Lockard
   
   Jim
   
     
On 3/11/98 10:54 PM Thomas A. Easop wrote:
     
>Jim Cobb wrote:
>
>> >When was the last time you orally inflated anything on a tech dive??? 
>>
>> What kind of stupid question is that? You are saying that all manual 
>> inflators should be removed from all BCs becauses YOU have never used 
>> one? Say, you don't have a bucket on your head, do you?
>
>No bucket here, in fact, I learned to dive a long time ago, when there 
>were no
>autoinflators. Everything was manual, I did plenty of manual inflation, and 
>auto inflators were considered uneeded and 'tekkie'. Today they are SOP. 
>And I
>didn't say anyone had to do anything, or remove anything. I just asked a 
>pretty
>simple and intelligent question. You said "in my experience" so I asked 
>for you
>to explain your experience. But I guess the 'experience' you are refering 
>to is
>your conjecture.
>
>> >I would like to hear of your personal CF experience where the 2nd inflator 
>> >contributed to the task load.
>>
>> OK, it was a dark and story night... Listen, numbnuts, remember that 
>> first time you tried to take off your girlfriends bra (assuming you're 
>> not a homo), didn't it piss you off when you discovered that there was
>> not 1, not 2, but 3 or even more clips back there? Why were there so many 
>> clips, because 1 could not do the job? No, because the No.1 fear of
>> adolescent girls is that a single clip might fail and the goodies will 
>> fall out for every to see. So the bra manufacturers outdid themselves by 
>> adding multiple clips to satisfy the "1 clip theory" girlish paranoia.
>
>My first girlfriend did not have any of this paranoia, had the front clip 
>type
>bra, and took it off when I politely asked her to so I never did have to 
>struggle like your 'experience'.
>
>> Thusly,  OMS stuper bondage wings are the training bra of the Tech diver 
>> industry. Easop, one day you too will graduate to a "1 clip" once you
>> overcome your adolescent, irrational fear of the unknown. 
>
>This irrational fear of the unkown is foriegn to me. I have seen with my own 
>eyes inflators and bladders fail on dives. And I have never had the bungees 
>force air out of my wings or been entangled by my backup inflator even 
>when it
>was not elegantly configured out of the way. Also I have used my drysuit as 
>backup BC on tech dives and I do not trust the neck seal, and it is very 
>uncomfortable, my rate minute volume went way up.
>
>Most of all, I have only heard conjecture about how bondage double bladder 
>wings are dangerous. No one has posted substantiated accounts of them causing 
>incidents or deaths, which brings us back to the origianl posts. Trusting the 
>cave diving elite in Florida with their propensity for exageration and making 
>unsubstantiated claims is impossible. Put up or shut up. Where are the 
>accounts
>of these wings causing deaths?
>
>Tom
>
>
     
     
 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Learn About Trimix At http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/trimix.html
     
     
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. 
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]