Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Randy Sullivan" <sulteck@ic*.ne*>
To: "Ingemar Lundgren" <ingemar.lundgren@mb*.sw*.se*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: ICE dives aren't Cave dives
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 11:31:38 -0500
I agree with you totally with the cold water kit on the Odin.  I've had it 6
mounts and have had to patch the rubber boot twice.   This is why I like the
conshelf so much.  You can't accidentally damage the cold water kit.

 About half of the tech divers here using Odins don't even use the cold
water kit.  I kind of figured that if the odin would freeflow it would hit
hard but I thought the only reg that would shut down was a dacor.

Randy Sullivan
Sault Ste. Marie, Ont
sulteck@ic*.ne*
-----Original Message-----
From: Ingemar Lundgren <ingemar.lundgren@mb*.sw*.se*>
To: Randy Sullivan <sulteck@ic*.ne*>
Cc: Sean T. Stevenson <ststev@un*.co*>; techdiver@aquanaut.com
<techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Date: Sunday, January 11, 1998 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: ICE dives aren't Cave dives


>I have been using the Apex TX50 for some years now and have made hundreds
of
>dives with it in cold water and never had a freflow. The Scubapro on the
other
>hand is useless for cold water diving , at least the G-250 and R-190 the
D-400
>seems to work a little better. The problem with the Scubapro is  largely
the1
>stage but if combined with a good cold water 1 stage like the Poseidon they
work
>pretty OK. It is a pity that Scubapro haven't come up with a better 1 stage
when
>they have such great 2 stages i haven't got any experience with the new 1
stages
>though maybe they are better. Mares regs are also pretty good for cold
water, i
>have some friends that use them with succes. I am using the AGA ffm for
shallow
>salvage work and have found it quite prone to freacing, have had several
>freeflows with it. The Poseidon also works fine but when it does start to
>freeflow it is very violent and goes quick. The Poseidon might also fail
to add
>during a freezeup witch is not very good and the enviromental kit for the 1
>stage is not a great design..
>
>
>Randy Sullivan wrote:
>
>> All of the reg failures that have seen have been second stage freezing.
On
>> examination post dive, the second stage is full of ice and the
intermediate
>> pressure is at the set psi.  If the psi had gone up this would suggest
1st
>> stage failure.  I haven't seen one of these.
>>
>> I like the conshelf because it works.  It may be helped out because of
the
>> metal 2nd stage that doesn't insulate the reg.  I now that's thin, but
the
>> reg still works all the time.   As for the Odin I haven't had it under
the
>> ice but the last cold water trail,  40* F in river with10 knot current,
>> working it extremely hard, performed as it should.
>>
>> This past spring a buddy and I were diving the St. Mary's river 2 or 3
times
>> a week.  It was fun to watch the submerged ice coming out of the
generating
>> station. The idea caught on and we would bring divers for their 2 minute
>> dive that end with the free flow.  I don't remember any of the models but
>> the dacors wouldn't make it to the water and the sherwoods would last
long
>> enough to get you wet.  The funny thing is that these divers with the
poor
>> equipment still use it.   I use rule # 1 all the time now, but
unfortunately
>> the one local dive shops still actively promote dacor & Sherwood.  This
does
>> limit the amount of dive buddies in the area.  These dives, would by this
>> listserv, would be considered rec. dives
>>
>> Technically speaking divers up hear use mostly Odins(75%)  or Scuba Pro.
I
>> see the odd cyclone and one guy uses Mares.  I have not seen a Poseidon
>> fail.  On the other hand I have seen the SP free flow, not all the time
but
>> often enough to remember.  The SP free flows have all been in the summer
and
>> start at depth.  They usually start to fail at 150' to 180' on the way
down.
>> This is real scary because when you think about it, that reg was at 80*F
2
>> minutes ago.
>>
>> Just my $0.02 on cold water regs, since this is almost all the diving
that I
>> do.
>>
>> Randy Sullivan
>> Sault Ste. Marie, Ont
>> sulteck@ic*.ne*
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sean T. Stevenson <ststev@un*.co*>
>> To: Randy Sullivan <sulteck@ic*.ne*>; techdiver@aquanaut.com
>> <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>> Date: Saturday, January 10, 1998 9:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: ICE dives aren't Cave dives
>>
>> >Good points, but I think we're going off on a bit of a tangent.  For
>> commercial or SAR work, we can
>> >use bandmasks, helmets, comms, hot water suits, surface supply and as
many
>> people as we need
>> >topside.  This thread started (I think) adressing only recreational type
>> ice diving on SCUBA.  For
>> >this type of diving, FFM's are a bad idea as you stated because of their
>> tendency to freeflow.  I
>> >have to question your assessment of regulator failures in your post.
>> Nearly all of the failures I
>> >have observed originate in the second stage, and I use SP MK 20's as
firsts
>> with no problems.
>> >Dacor is crap, but one of the Sherwood models (maximus, I think) has a
>> proven track record with the
>> >US antarctic diving program.
>> >
>> >-Sean
>>
>> --
>> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]