Unknown Microsoft mail form. Approximate representation follows. From: HeimannJ on Tue, Aug 2, 1994 2:40 PM Subject: RE: Gas with Air Repet To: Dan Nafe; techdiver This message was sent using a custom form that is not installed on your server. Some information from the original message may not be displayed. To view the complete message, ask your network manager to install the form on your server. Dan Nafe wrote (in response to my note): >> this. The real issue is that they don't account for the fact that existing >> He bubbles from the previous dive may make the Haldanean model too >> inaccurate. Then again, I don't believe that custom table programs take this >> into account either, except insofar as they may use different J factors than > >MiGPlan does take absorbed He and N2 from previous dives and calculates >inert gas loading and decompression obligation for multi-leve/repetitive ... >MiGPlan does not account for Helium bubbles (!) that the poster was >talking about. (I'm sure he meant absorbed/dissolved/saturated Helium.) No, I meant bubbles. A certain degree of bubbling is likely after a dive, even though neo-Haldanean models like Buhlmann, which is what I assume MiG plan uses, don't explicitly take them into account. My understanding is that most implementations assume that He and N2 ongassing and offgassing are independent and governed by Henry's law. Among the ways in which this assumption can fail is if He bubbles from a previous dive affect circulation, especially in the alveoli. They could then significantly affect N2 offgassing. I admit here that I studied physics and not physiology - but I don't sell decompression software. John
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]