Tony As I have already answered you inprivate E mails as I thought your mail was private this will be brief. First I did not say any thing about the either the quality or like of quality in ANDI. I simply stated my history correction had nothing to do with it being either a good or bad program. On the history it would not be important if ANDI supporters would quit making false statements about the evolution of EANX and tech diving. There havve been published materials in th UK and USA reflecting similar claims. I agree the future is important and that is why it took over a year of hearing various form of BS along these lines before I responded. As far as I'm concerned the response has been made it is factual and for those few who even care it should settle the matter. It will only become a big discussion on the net if you and Stuart chose to push the points. I do think you want to do that. How are you comming along on estabalishing technical diving programs for ANDI at least now they do have a tech diver producing their tech material. Like most in the revolving new tech training agencies you started your in depth tech orientation with the agencies that did it IANTD, NACD, NSS. We trained you well and gave you a lot of support I guess it is paying off for you in your new direction. Tom
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]