Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 04:59:55 -0800
From: atikkan@ix*.ne*.co* (EE Atikkan )
Subject: Special operations
To: techdiver@terra.net
You wrote: 

>
>Re: the New Gun in Town
>
>A few thoughts from the left side of the U.S. - 
>Tek diving and Military special operations have many similarities:
>
>Both operate in a relatively dangerous environment
>Both require fit individuals
>We have found that Teams work better than "heros"
>Equipment redundancy is essential - remember that "two is one - one is none"
>
>Both require meticulous attention to planning and preparation
>
>Both are intolerant of poor equipment, inadequate training and unreliable
>personnel (operators)
>
>Both require that you "know yourself and your enemy" (your limitations and
>the environment)
>
>Both require an almost reflexive reaction to danger or equipment failure.
>
>Both require FREQUENT REALISTIC practice to maintain acceptable skill levels
>
>Mark Lonsdale
>Special Operations Instructor
>STTU 
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'.
>Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'.
>
>

Interesting analogy.  However:

1.	Most that have learned to cope with adversity
in a non-combat environment (including pararescue operations) do not consider
environment an enemy to overcome/neutralize, but use as an ally.  I am sure that
numerous special operations & in particular clandestine operations take that 
approach as well.
2.	Combat situations introduce a variable (force seeking to neutralize), while
diving
does not have that factor - even GW's can not be regarded as forces plotting to
neutralize.
3.	Diving does not take place in envrionments that are necessarily dangerous. 
They
just have limited life support capability & thus intolerant of failure, probably
more so than failed 'special operations'. (i.e. failed hostage rescue mission
in Iran)
4.	Though the cave diving community appears to firmly believe in 'two is one -
one is none', other areas of diving do not necessarily espouse that concept
when it
comes to buddies.  Self reliance is held ahead of buddy reliance
5.	The fitness parameters are not necessarily the same (pretty successful 55
year
old tek divers out there, not many special forces operatives of that age). 
Also probably
less credence given to reflexive in the case of diving, even disawowed, as
most of who have had to bail out of situtaions did it cooly, deliberately & 
relatively slowly (obviously OOA excluded in the slow, though actions again were
deliberate).

Otherwise some interesting parallels 
Regards

Esat Atikkan

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]