On Sun, 29 Oct 1995, A.Appleyard wrote: > Much of technical diving's load is keeping track of the endless complications > caused by narcosis and bends caused by diluents. Diluents are the devil in > diving, complicating things and making sets and training complicated and > bulkier. It seems to me that an ultimate way to dive up to 100 or 200 feet > would be a <reliable medication to prevent oxygen poisoning> up to say 7 bar > ppO2. Then divers could reach 200 feet (60 meters) on a good old plain simple > light oxygen rebreather, no diluent bends, no narcosis, no computerization, no > fiddly correlation of gas flow with gas proportion calculations, no ppO2 > meters, none of all this messing-about! > How much work <has> been done into the detailed mechanics and biochemistry > and neurocybernetics of what causes divers' oxygen poisoning? > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. > I have a question about this!! Say it would be possible to offset O2 toxicity symptoms. You can only metabolize so much oxygen, and after that point is reached the oxygen would then be dissolved into ones system unused. Provided no toxicity problems occured, it would then be possible to become bent on oxygen. If this is possible, I would guess that the decompress schedule would be lighter due to not only the offgassing of O2, but the metabolizing of O2. It could also be guessed the the greater the workload the less the decompression schedule. My question is then would it be possible to dissolve this much O2 into the body to cause decompression concerns? Then, with the recent debate of O2 narcosis, would it be worse then N2 narcosis, and therefore feasible to do this? Flame away!!!!! Aloha Tony
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]