Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 23:56:38 EDT
From: Jeff Kell <JEFF@UT*.UT*.ED*>
Organization: University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Subject: Re: new here
To: rnf@sp*.tb*.co*, techdiver@terra.net
On Mon, 23 Oct 1995 21:53:36 +0500 Rick Fincher said:
>Rod Farb wrote:
>> In the past fifteen years, six divers have died diving the U-352. They
>> had loads of merit badges for diving and plenty of training in quarry
>> diving. A few were instructors and dive masters. Most were using a single 80
>> with no backup and embolised bolting to the surface after running out of air

I think that alone speaks volumes about recreational diving.  Out of air?
The most basic, fundamental problem which shouldn't happen to anyone (or if
you suspect it might, you have alternate source(s) at the least).

Basic open water (at least PADI) training limits divers to 60 feet, almost
chosen as a reasonable limit for an emergency ascent without going ballistic
and embolizing.  But that fact isn't stressed, just that you are limited to
60'; then proceed to explain the "worst case" scenario having not one, but
five solutions:  controlled ascent, alternate air source (pony is mentioned),
swimming ascent, buddy breathing, and buoyant ascent.  I don't think there is
enough "fire and brimstone" put into this sermon, especially the fact that
this model breaks down in "deep" diving.  Now you're down to two options, or
if no calm, helpful buddy right at hand, make that one; or if you have no pony
lets make that zero.

If you were trained in NC, perhaps more emphasis was placed on that fact.
But MANY MANY divers have the attitude that it "won't be a problem".

[\] Jeff Kell <jeff@ut*.ut*.ed*>

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]