>Data gleaned from controlled experiments is always more useful than >anecdote. However, for many aspects of diving physiology, we don't have >the luxury of such data. The question then becomes, do we assume we know >nothing, or do we look at anecdote with a handful of salt thrown in? The >asnwer, of course, depends on many different things. In general, you're better off assuming you know nothing because quite often anecdotal evidence misses *critical* pieces of information. Even if you take it with a handful of salt, it may be pointing you in *completely* the wrong direction - better to make NO conclusion than the WRONG conclusion. -Carl-
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]