> In general, you're better off assuming you know nothing because quite > often anecdotal evidence misses *critical* pieces of information. > Even if you take it with a handful of salt, it may be pointing you in > *completely* the wrong direction - better to make NO conclusion than > the WRONG conclusion. I think a better way to say this is that better not dive at all if untested factors are at play, which means better not dive at all period. In many cases, I agree with you. In others, I trust the anecdote (and my personal experience) a lot more than the published studies. The problem with the studies is that they often target a very specific thing, but then get misinterpreted and cited as demonstrating something altogether different. Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]