At 6:09 PM 10/1/95, <gmiiii@in*.co*> wrote: >The part I don't like about NOAA is the >short exposure, high PPO2 matrix. This is poison in >the wrong hands. If you intend to do a 45 minute dive >at 1.6, and let's say your scooter breaks, so you swim >out, now you have an hour dive and you are working. I agree that O2 exposure MUST be considered in the risk planning. I would ask if you consider the risk to be the planned PPO2 or the "worst case" failure. For example, would you consider it OK to do a 15 minute dive at 1.6? Or how about a backup gas at lower PPO2, but longer deco if you have to use it? ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@da*.ne*
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]