Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:16:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Paul W. Smith" <afn20573@fr*.uf*.ed*>
To: rnf@sp*.tb*.co*
cc: techdiver@terra.net
Subject: Re: Challenge to present assumptions on deco theory
I just read the Scientific American article, one paragraph is:
" Paradoxically, bubbles do not seem to form within the blood itself. 
Experiments first performed by...Erasmus...showed that when sealed in its 
natural container-a blood vessel-and isolated from the circulation, blood 
does not bubble even when severely decompressed. These observations were 
confirmed in our laboratory, where we could not detect bubbles in blood 
in an isolated vein even after we decompressed it from 122 atmospheres. 
Something in addition to supersaturation seems to be required for bubbles 
to form."

This indicates to me that the bubbles are not coming from the blood. Of 
course, this does not mean that Doppler bubbles are not giving us useful 
information...  Paul Smith

On Wed, 20 Sep 1995 rnf@sp*.tb*.co* wrote:
> Dan wrote:
> Question: How does Doppler bubble detection correlate to tissue bubbles? 
> Intuitively I would think bubbles would form in the blood first, so Doppler 
> would be a good gauge for the edges of the envelope.
> 
> Intuition is often wrong in this area, though. Have there been any in vitro
or 
> animal studies that compare the onset of bubble formation in blood vs tissues 
> to confirm this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rick Fincher
> rnf@sp*.tb*.co*
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'.
> Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'.
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]