> >From: Private_User@fo*. > > [snip] > > >In the old days the rule was PPO2 of 2.0 at approx 256' on air was ok. > > I'm confused by this too. I work 256' on air to be 1.839 ATA PP02. > > [(256/33) + 1] * .21 = 1.839, right? > > Can someone confirm or deny this? > > Thanks, > Scott. Confirm. As I remember from "The Old Days" you figured your air to be 20%, PpO2 of 2.0 was 10ATA, 297 FSW. At least that's what I learned in 1981. I guess it's not that much of "Old Days" compared to some. I've never heard of 256FSW (I KNOW no one would dare say 256FFW) being a PpO2 of 2.0. Talk about new math... Ken -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ken Sallot "Sallot's law of patches - A person's diving CIRCA ability is inversely proportional to how (904) 392-2007 many patches(stickers) they have on their kens@uf*.ed* jacket(car)" http://grove.ufl.edu/~ken -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]