Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:15:36 -0400
To: Capt JT <captjt@mi*.co*>
From: Rodriguez <mikey@ma*.ne*>
Subject: Re:O2 exposure
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
At 05:22 PM 9/9/2002 -0400, Capt JT wrote:

Hello JT,

[snip]

>susceptibilities of the exposed tissue. You must take into account PO2 and 
>duration of the exposure. Each person can have different levels of exposure 
>they can handle and some will say they have the correct answers on this 
>subject, but the only answer they have is for themselves or the test 
>subject when pushing the limits.

[snip]

You're completely wrong here.  Every study I've ever seen on
susceptibility to O2 tox has consistently shown that there is no
such thing as "being able to handle O2".  In every study, the
same diver at the same PO2 over the course of the study has toxed
as various different times, and no effort to correlate those times
to fatigue, hydration, absolute pressure, lighting, moisture,
nutrition, or any other factor has been successful.  In other
words, just because you sat for 40 minutes at 3.0 without toxing
today doesn't mean you can do it for 5 minutes tomorrow and not
tox.  It's a complete crap-shoot.  The best you can do is to keep
the exposure low (certainly never more than 1.6) and the odds will
be in your favor.  The more extreme the dive, the more
conservative you should be to keep those odds on your side.

-Mike Rodriguez
<mikey@mi*.ne*>
http://www.mikey.net/scuba
Pn(x) = (1/(2^n)n!)[d/dx]^n(x^2 - 1)^n

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]