Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:00:26 +0100
To: wendell grogan <docgrog@ya*.de*>
From: Dave Robbins <DIR@Po*.co*>
Subject: Re: VBTech vs. Nova Tech
Cc: "techdiver@aquanaut.com" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Wendel,

In the UK, due to tides, it is very rare to find dive boats anchoring to 
wrecks.
The normal way to dive here is for the wreck to be 'shot'
~ this is a 56lb weight on the correct length of rope with a large buoy at 
the top.
There is usually a smaller one attached about 2m down from the top.  This 
allows the
tide to be gauged as we can only dive when the tide is slack.
All our dive planning and departure times etc are totally governed by this 
tide window.

Some skippers use a grapnel type shot, which is basically a 1/2m box 
section filled with lead and
tines welded on the sides so it grips the wreck better.

To shot a wreck, we would locate it using GPS and a good sounder.  We would 
then drive up tide and past the
wreck & drop the shot.  This would ( hopefully ) land on the uptide end of 
the wreck, with the shot line going
over the wreck, so the divers always find the wreck.  Note: our visibility 
is normally about 5m with >10m only at
exceptional times.

At no time would we ever send down a diver to tie in to a wreck ~ our 
Health and Safety Executive would
have our guts for garters.  The skill of the skipper is key to being able 
to do this & generally most
UK skippers hit the wreck first time & this is confirmed by 'seeing' the 
shot line on the echo sounder.
Submarines are sometimes slippery customers, particularly if they are 
aligned bow to stern with the tide,  but
never the less any decent skipper can normally hit even the smallest of 
targets.
One skipper down here is capable of 'shotting' wrecks that are in 150m of 
water in a 5kn tide.

When the divers ( and the tide ) are ready, the boat would approach and go 
past the buoy very slightly ( into tide ) &
the divers would jump off the boat ( usually a horn is blown ).  As there 
is fractions of tide left, the divers
drift gently down onto to the buoy & after exchanging signals, decend.
This is repeated for all divers, with a gap of about 3mins to allow each 
team of divers to decend.

The divers locate the wreck by following the shotline down.  It would be 
impossible and dangerous
to attempt to find the wreck without a fixed datum.  Our visibility & tide 
preclude a diver finding the wreck by
either just dropping down or even scootering down.

The boat then protects the area from shipping ( flying the international 
'divers down' 'A' flag )
The boat then protects the SMBs as they are launched by each diver for deco.

At the end of the dive, the shot is recovered using a pot 
winch.  Occasionally the weight is lost, due to
it becoming embedded into the wreck, but the winch is strong enough to 
break the line, so the rope is
re-used.

hope this helps you get an appreciation of how we do things on the other 
side of the pond.

The deco is done drifting as described previously and is as relaxed and 
comfortable as we can
possibly make it.

best,
Dave

At 07:43 AM 7/29/02 -0700, wendell grogan wrote:

>Just before this latest tiff started, I had been
>getting a lot of very interesting information (off
>list) on how things are done in the British Isles.
>They do this (drift deco after dive bombing the wreck)
>as a matter of routine, but there is quite a bit to
>consider and a number of new skills to be practiced
>for this to come out right.
>I was also thinking about the advantages last weekend
>while doing my 20 foot stop along with what seemed
>like a cast of thousands, the boat bucking in rollers
>perpendicular to the slight current and helping out my
>buddy with a leaking back up reg hose...
>Basic Anglo-Saxon words regarding various bodily
>functions kept going through my mind, but the
>conclusion seems to be that we should start doing this
>here in the North Atlantic US.
>The problems are inertia and a lack of
>experience/training that would make it a matter of
>routine for most if not all dives.  Also, since the
>thing that drives the industry is people who are
>either taking or just finishing AOW going on shallow
>wreck dives, finding a boat operator who wants to run
>the training dives on what would normally be their
>milk run wrecks, is going to be tough.
>Wendell
>
>--- Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*> wrote:
> > This leads back to the basic question: What do you
> > require to be on your
> > diveboat before you go out on it? George knows this
> > situation with
> > chaseboats and his solution, which costs the dive
> > operations nothing but
> > some fuel and inconvinence, is to not anchor to a
> > wreck during a dive.
> > Problem solved. No chaseboat needed, no deployment
> > issues.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
>http://health.yahoo.com
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]