Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Jim, you are quite the hypocrite. It is not ok for your boy on the Seeker to lie about GUE - read what he wrote. That is hardly what I do with your little buddies at the agencies - I merely point out the truth. I challenged you to produce one thing I have ever said that is not true, and you can not do it. GUE has nothing to do with me nor me with it and Panos just made that clear. You really are an idiot - first you say that my style is preventing GUE from going anywhere, and then you accuse Panos of going along with me since it is creating a "love fest" for GUE. What you really want is for me to shut up. Nothing anyone can do will ever stop me from hammering idiots where they need it. If you do not like it, either ignore it, refute it with some facts, or correct it - you obviously can not refute it, have no interest in fixing it, and only want me to go away - not going to happen. Jarrod does not like my style,he has come on here and said so, Panos does not like it and just told you so . GUE does not itself allow its people to treat idiots like you with the disrespect they deserve. Still waiting for one example of me being wrong about any of this. -----Original Message----- From: jimcurtis@di*.co* [mailto:jimcurtis@di*.co*] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:07 AM To: techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: Re:GUE Message text written by INTERNET:PAlexakos@ao*.co* >I applaud your familiarity with Walt Disney. Mine is poor, so your colorful rhetoric is lost on me.< I'm sorry you had such a deprived childhood, but it explains a lot. Maybe you should take a vacation and check it out. It might improve your dispostion. >Anyhow, the analogy you seek to establish between Mr. Crowley and your thinly veiled reference to Mr. Irvine is a poor one, not only because Mr. Irvine is not an officer of this organization, but because in the case of Mr. Crowley, there is ample evidence that he, in fact, knowingly misrepresented the facts. In the case of Mr. Irvine, perhaps the organizations he criticized did not feel that they recourse against him for the claims that he made. For the record, GUE's "methods" do not include slander, insults, or lies; our "whining" is merely a request for accurate representation. In our opinion, the intentional distortion of the truth, designed to harm another, falls outside the domain of free speech, forcing us to take measures to curtail them.< Get over it the boat sank! You started this entire thread by threatening to sue the Seeker when you got some of your own medicine and having the "usual suspects" chime in. A response I might add which is all to familiar when these things appear on the list. If you're not happy with the results of "guilt by association" with Mr. Irvine (Are you saying he IS Mr. DIR?), too bad. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe I have seen one post on this list, by an OFFICER of your organization, disassociating yourselves with his rhetoric, communicative style or opinions. Nor have I seen an officer of any other certifying agency come on here and bash GUE in a similar manner. However, it seems you have enjoyed and exploited the GUE "love fest" it has generated. Perhaps your desire for litigation is focused in the wrong direction. Then maybe you wouldn't be spending all your time defending yourself. Don't bother responding to this, I already see I'm wasting my time. I believe the line "Me thinks you doth protest too much" applies. Jim -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]