Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Art.Paltz@R2*.CO*
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: RE: GUE and Drivers License
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:22:41 -0400
No, I think you should hold people responsible for their own actions!  Why
is it always black and white, only one person responsible?  Can't the idiot
and the boat captain share responsibility?  The person is stupid to jump
into the water with no training but the captain would also be negligent (in
my opinion) to allow that person on board with the intention of diving
without any training.  The idiot paid the ultimate price for his/her
stupidity with their life but the captain must also share the responsibility
for not trying to avoid an accident.

If the guy has training and equipment that is acceptable (again, whatever
that means) and jumps into the water and dies on the bottom because they ran
out of air, there really isn't much the captain could do.  If the captain
allowed the person to jump into 200 ft deep water with 30 lbs of weight and
only a spare air in hand then they have been negligent.

This list is always bashing the Seeker (No I don't dive with them, haven't
for years now) for it's practices but now you are saying the captain has no
responsibility?  Seems like a double standard just to make your argument.
Tim, I don't know if you have personally bashed Dan about how he runs his
boat, this is a generalization on the list.  One minute you (the list) are
saying that Dan should be put in jail for allowing people to use air, Odin
regulators, Inspirations and ponies strapped to their backs but then you
don't think he's responsible for checking credentials?  Just don't seem to
make sense?

Art.


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Timothy Doty [mailto:TDoty@vi*.or*] 
Sent:	Monday, July 15, 2002 9:13 AM
To:	Art.Paltz@R2*.CO*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject:	RE: GUE and Drivers License





>If a dive boat allows someone with no training but has all the latest and
greatest dive >gear board the boat and do a dive and dies then they are
irresponsible and will get >sued.  That's the correct thing to do.

>If a dive shop allows someone to walk in the door, talk the talk and get
scuba fills
>and then goes out and gets them selves killed while diving without proper
training, they >are also going to get sued.  That would also be
irresponsible.  Personally I hate this >"sue craze" we have in the US but
this is one time when it is warranted.

Your absolutely right, we shouldn't hold individuals responsible for their
own actions at all.  I agree that dive boats/shops should check for
c-cards, but I think we look at it the wrong way.  The boat/shop is trying
to keep an untrained diver from doing something that might get themselves
killed.  If I buy a car does the dealer check to make sure I have a
license?  The gas station?  Repair station?  I'm talking about something
that's a lot more dangerous than diving...



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]