Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "MHK" <mhkane@pr*.ne*>
To: "Chris Tellers" <chris_tellers@ho*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: DIR Training question
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:11:08 -0700
Chris,

You ask a good question, and I hope Andrew or JJ is available to further
advise.  But from my conversations with both Andrew and JJ on this very
subject all I can say at this point is that they are both sensitive to the
issue, and that GUE is in the process of developing a open water program.
In fact, Andrew G is beta testing the program at his Seattle store right
now.

As with most business that are in the initial growth stage there needs to be
a balance between the concentration on quality and the demand..  GUE has
experienced explosive growth in the last couple of years, and the
cornerstone of the growth has been that they have resisted the industry
trend of dilution of quality in favor of market share.  Rather then have
massive IDC's and IE's that would turn out instructors by the masses, GUE
has concentrated it's efforts on slower growth in favor of more selective
candidates.  To that end building an infrastructure from both the practical
academic end, as well as, selecting instructor candidates that recognize and
will adhere to the rigorous GUE standards and commitments is a delicate
balancing act..

In any event, realize that I'm speaking for myself, based upon my
conversations with AG and JJ, so I hope either of them will be available to
expand but my sense is that I've conveyed a fairly accurate portrayal of
where they stand in terms of the open water program..

Later
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Tellers" <chris_tellers@ho*.co*>
To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 3602 12:45 AM
Subject: DIR Training question


> I've been diving for about a year and a half and have recently gotten
interested in the new worlds that technical (especially cave) diving has to
offer.  In researching training agencies, instructors and the like I came
across the DIR concept and I must say that it makes a hell of a lot of sense
to me.  Seems to deal with problems I've noticed with the ways I was taught
to configure my gear and position myself in my NAUI courses.  Since I've
repositioned my weight and tanks to make myself level and stopped flutter
kicking on the bottom I'm much more efficient and no longer the standard
Florida reef destroying machine most divers are.
>
>
>
> Anyway, my new girlfriend wants to get certified to dive, so I thought I'd
find a class that could get her going with DIR from day one.  In looking at
the GUE site, however, I see that the DIR Fundamentals course requires open
water certification + 25 dives.  What's up with that?!  Given the
counter-intuitive, unnatural character of scuba diving, why not encourage
new divers to start out DIR from the beginning rather than insisting they
spend months learning bad habits and doing it wrong?
>
>
>
> I know this isn't a question about technical diving, but given that the
DIR philosophy is that the fundamentals apply to rec diving as well, I
thought I'd ask it here.
>
>
>
> Sign me, Mystified in Florida.
>
>
>
> Chris Tellers
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]