Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Eric, could you please inform the know-it-all Christina and the rest of the idiots who contribute nothing to this knowledge base but claim it all after the fact when you and I first discussed bubble mechanics as the explanation for the WKPP's success using deep stops to shorten and correct the entire deco. About how many years ago was that? -----Original Message----- From: Eric Maiken [mailto:EricMaiken@ms*.co*] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:18 AM To: techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: RE: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models Bruce: Maybe people are just a little too concerned with the recent allegations those on the Q-cleared side of LANL releasing "the people's software" from their home offices! Eric Maiken > > FYI Collective Info, > > 1) CRAY YMP work (many 12 yrs ago) was done on Haldane > repets (using > USN Tables), published in open literature, and adopted by > NAUI AS SUCH -- > has nothing to do with RGBM nor codes; > > 2) SAME thing about SGI ORIGIN risk analysis performed on > rec repets > using Haldane and phase risk indicators -- nothing to > do with RGBM > nor codes used for staging. > > 3) recall that I work in a TOP SECRET side of LANL; > > Cheers, > > BW > > > >I like to ask for some clarification on this. In several of > his papers, > >there are references of run time on CRAY Y-MP which is > installed at Los > >Alamos Nat. Labs. This include the one on Abyss web site > with reference for > >1 min run time to compute the trimix table. > > > >In his latest book, Technical Diving in Depth, page 160, he > also reference > >that simulation was done on a SGI Origin SMP - that Origin 2000 is > >government property. It also listed that the code was done > in FORTRAN 77/90 > >and BASIC. Source code size is 1,640 line and cost was $4,500. > > > > > >It seems that portion of the work was done with government > resource. Is > >there something I miss reading? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Leonard Tsai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Christina M. Young [mailto:christina@ch*.co*] > >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:34 PM > >To: trey@ne*.co*; brw@la*.go* > >Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com > >Subject: Re: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models > > > >If RGBM was developed, tested, etc under contract with the > US Govt, or by a > >govt employee using govt resources, then it is required to > be public domain > >(by law). Back when I worked in the aerospace industry, all > source code for > >the weapons system software I developed under US govt > contract was owned by > >the US govt, not the contractor. > > > >Privately developed stuff is totally different - we do not > use govt labs for > >product development. > > > >As it is, Bruce Wienke e-mailed me privately, and said that RGBM was > >developed using his own personal resources (in Fortran on > his PC). I assume > >this includes all of development - design, coding, > simulation, testing, etc. > >Somehow I was under the assumption that this was developed > and / or tested > >at Los Alamos National Labs, using LANL resources. > > > > Subscriptions/removals should be sent to > rmurray@de*.or*. Ftp site: ftp://ftp.decompression.org/pub > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]