Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*>
To: <christi5@ix*.ne*.co*>, <trey@ne*.co*>, <brw@la*.go*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 06:56:01 -0500
Christina, I have no interest in any of what you do or think you are doing
diving wise ( the shipwreck anecdotes are interesting, the diving is a
travesty) , or any use of CCRs what so ever. If I want a gas extension
device, I know the right way to do that, and have the records to prove it ,
as does Reinhard.

When I get as many cave dives as I have ocean and wreck dives, I will be too
old to dive.

When I need to start listening to crap from somebody with a tiny fraction of
my knowledge whom I have seen in person proving cluelessness beyond the
pale, that will be what is called a "cold day in hell".

The issue here is not your "bodybuilding" ( although as usual, this sport
attracts some real weirdoes, and a ton of geeks), the issue is your and your
idiot friends' insistence that the WKPP has not done what it has done and
developed what is has developed. That denial is pretty obvious. I have
watched all of you struggle with ignorance and a lack of information while I
was doing the dives, creating gear , and producing great information that
none of you want to acknowledge, and all of you want to claim as your own
once it becomes too clearly correct to deny. You never did a dive that even
equaled the time of one of my deco stops, yet you have all the answers and I
know nothing?

Again, ask Weinke what he thinks my contribution is. You don't want to hear
it, and neither do any of you SWBS crowd, but reality keeps moving forward
anyway.

"Yank chains" all you want. The score is your contribution "0", mine
immeasurable. By the way, your comment about me not liking girls who
bodybuild is a hoot. If you want to see what an in-shape girl is supposed to
look like, go to Pina's website. Guys are supposed to look like me, girls
like her. Write that down, Christina.


-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Young [mailto:christi5@ix*.ne*.co*]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:02 PM
To: trey@ne*.co*; brw@la*.go*
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: RE: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models


George (or should I say Katherine V, whatever... we all know you don't like
girls that work out or bodybuild),

Sure I don't do the dives you do (have no interest in diving in holes in the
ground to see wet rocks), and you don't do the dives I do either.  So there!
You don't have anywhere near the North Atlantic wreck diving record that I
have.  You're just a wannabe.  ;-)

Just because CCRs may not be optimal for what you do with the WKPP (see
http://www.aquanaut.com/bin/mlist/aquanaut/techdiver/display?38602,from),
doesn't mean they're not okay for any scenario (like ocean diving,
especially for certain scenarios where they can reduce overall risk).  Even
you would like one for the ocean, rigged with a butt-mounted bailout like
mine:

http://www.aquanaut.com/bin/mlist/aquanaut/techdiver/display?16992,subject

That was your response to Kevin's post:

http://www.aquanaut.com/bin/mlist/aquanaut/techdiver/display?16980,subject

Your other comments on rebreathers:

http://www.aquanaut.com/bin/mlist/aquanaut/techdiver/display?16950,subject

We all know you want one!  ;-)  ;-)  Sign up for Kevin's class, okay?  Has
nothing to do with money, though I heard that you expect to get stuff cheap
or free for some reason....

It's fun to come on here every once in a while to yank your chain!  You're a
very funny character, a constant source of amusement.  Unfortunately, the
opportunity cost of me doing so is very high as my time is very expensive.
So see ya later!

Christina

-----Original Message-----
From: George Irvine [mailto:girvine@be*.ne*]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 7:17 AM
To: christina@ch*.co*; trey@ne*.co*; brw@la*.go*
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: RE: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models


Christina, or is it Christopher, I am not going to sit here and let a
disgusting transformer like you throw crap at me. I have no interest in
using any MK15 Rb, and if you merely ask Kevin or Joe Ditturi why I don't
use that or any other ccr, they could explain to your naive ass why they
don't work for the diving we do.

You can ask Wienke when we started using some of his work, and you can go
back and look at the dives I did before you knew what the word
"decompression" meant. You can ask Weinke what he thinks of my contribution
to this aspect of diving. What is yours? Nothing. You don't do the dives,
Chris, we do, and you don't have any business even attempting to discredit
the work I have proven out in decompression. Your problem, like the rest of
the wannabees on the rebreather list, is that nobody who really knows
anything will waste any time talking to you, so out come the resentments and
the bullshit.

If you were even remotely serious about getting info from Bruce, you would
have emailed him privately instead of being an asshole on here.

Once again, the stroke crowd tries to disrupt a good discussion among
knowledgeable players.

I am sure you are real proud of the money you spent on your ccr, and I am
sure it makes you feel like a "big swinging dick", but you don't have any
business telling me I "can't afford one", and that I think tells everyone
here where you and your pals are coming from - nowhere, not to mention the
ignorance of a comment like that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina M. Young [mailto:christina@ch*.co*]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:34 PM
To: trey@ne*.co*; brw@la*.go*
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models


Pure rubbish.  There you go again, turning the truth upside down.  The fact
is that I was one of the earliest fans of RGBM, way before you had ever even
heard of it.  Check the techdiver archives for the in-depth discussion we
had about it back in March of 1995 (before you ever came along).  As is
typical, the WKPP types come along much later and imply they invented it.

I wanted to get the RGBM algorithms and the source so that Phi can put it in
his Palm DecoWeenie software, which is the best thing going in the way of
decompression programs.  I asked Chris Parrett to port Abyss over to the
Palm several years ago, but he e-mailed me that there was no market for it.
And to add to that, Abyss still doesn't support constant PPO2 divers, with
or without RGBM (a beta is just getting started).

If RGBM was developed, tested, etc under contract with the US Govt, or by a
govt employee using govt resources, then it is required to be public domain
(by law).  Back when I worked in the aerospace industry, all source code for
the weapons system software I developed under US govt contract was owned by
the US govt, not the contractor.

Privately developed stuff is totally different - we do not use govt labs for
product development.

As it is, Bruce Wienke e-mailed me privately, and said that RGBM was
developed using his own personal resources (in Fortran on his PC).  I assume
this includes all of development - design, coding, simulation, testing, etc.
Somehow I was under the assumption that this was developed and / or tested
at Los Alamos National Labs, using LANL resources.

Fair enough.

By the way, I've heard that you've been looking around to take a Mk-15
rebreather class.  Did you know that Kevin The Dude is going to be teaching
one down in your area in mid-March?  Give him a call at (814)395-3609 and
he'll set you up.  If you've been saving up your pennies, maybe you'll even
be able to afford one from him this time around.

Cheers,
Christina

-----Original Message-----
From: trey@ne*.co* [mailto:trey@ne*.co*]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 6:51 AM
To: Young, Christina; brw@la*.go*
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: RE: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models


Why don't you tell us where we can get Intel's chip codes, Christina? They
do a lot of Government work, too. The fact is you don't believe any of this
works anyway because it does not fit your "reality", so it is unlikely that
you have any real interest here in doing anything but what the rest of the
onlookers do - "demand" that we tell how we do things that you do not need
to know about.

-----Original Message-----
From: Young, Christina [mailto:christina.young@in*.co*]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:00 PM
To: 'brw@la*.go*'
Cc: 'techdiver@aquanaut.com'
Subject: Re: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models


Hi Bruce,
This is very interesting and convincing, RGBM certainly appears to more
rigorously developed and tested compared to anything else out there.

Since this was developed at LANL using U.S. Government supercomputers and
other resources, it is public domain, right?  Can you point me to where I
can obtain the algorithms and source code?

Thanks,
Christina



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]