FYI Collective Info, 1) CRAY YMP work (many 12 yrs ago) was done on Haldane repets (using USN Tables), published in open literature, and adopted by NAUI AS SUCH -- has nothing to do with RGBM nor codes; 2) SAME thing about SGI ORIGIN risk analysis performed on rec repets using Haldane and phase risk indicators -- nothing to do with RGBM nor codes used for staging. 3) recall that I work in a TOP SECRET side of LANL; Cheers, BW >I like to ask for some clarification on this. In several of his papers, >there are references of run time on CRAY Y-MP which is installed at Los >Alamos Nat. Labs. This include the one on Abyss web site with reference for >1 min run time to compute the trimix table. > >In his latest book, Technical Diving in Depth, page 160, he also reference >that simulation was done on a SGI Origin SMP - that Origin 2000 is >government property. It also listed that the code was done in FORTRAN 77/90 >and BASIC. Source code size is 1,640 line and cost was $4,500. > > >It seems that portion of the work was done with government resource. Is >there something I miss reading? > >Thanks, > >Leonard Tsai > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Christina M. Young [mailto:christina@ch*.co*] >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:34 PM >To: trey@ne*.co*; brw@la*.go* >Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com >Subject: Re: MORE:: RGBM vs VPM Deco Models > >If RGBM was developed, tested, etc under contract with the US Govt, or by a >govt employee using govt resources, then it is required to be public domain >(by law). Back when I worked in the aerospace industry, all source code for >the weapons system software I developed under US govt contract was owned by >the US govt, not the contractor. > >Privately developed stuff is totally different - we do not use govt labs for >product development. > >As it is, Bruce Wienke e-mailed me privately, and said that RGBM was >developed using his own personal resources (in Fortran on his PC). I assume >this includes all of development - design, coding, simulation, testing, etc. >Somehow I was under the assumption that this was developed and / or tested >at Los Alamos National Labs, using LANL resources. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]