Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Jsuw@ao*.co*
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 10:11:45 EST
Subject: Re: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com

--part1_a2.1f11ea10.2971ac31_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en

I have never done sidemount, so I can't speak to that, but I can say that=20
I've seen a number of these discussions where one group or individual loudly=
=20
says that DIR will not work in their environment, only to finally come to th=
e=20
conclusion that there is no reason it won't.  Not only that, but it probably=
=20
will streamline, simplify, and make safer what is done.

I have a feeling if those that insist that DIR will not work in this=20
environment truly have an idea of what DIR means, then they would adopt it,=20
and find that it works better than their current approach.  Change is often=20
difficult to accept.  DIR would look at changes to equipment configuration,=20
teamwork, and attitude.  A first step is admitting that there is room for=20
improvement in what is currently being done.

Jan S.


In a message dated 1/11/02 10:20:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,=20
diverdominic@ho*.co* writes:


> I have just one question:
> Why do you keep saying "You"? I'm not a cave diver, here or anywhere else.=
=20
> I=20
> thought the way I referred to the CDG as "them" rather than "us" would hav=
e=20
>=20
> made that clear.
> I came across the article I posted a while ago, and found it an interestin=
g=20
>=20
> one. It's the only place I've come across that doesn't just say "Our=20
> approach is just as good as DIR" but actually goes so far as to say "DIR=20
> wouldn't work here." And having seen some of the photos in their gallery=20
> page, such as=20
> http://www.cavedivinggroup.org.uk/images/Photos/BBC/pages/Gary_gif.htm I=20
> found it hard to refute their argument that backmounts wouldn't work, or=20
> that it would be very hard to pass a reg to someone behind you in some of=20
> the caves they dive in.
> If you'd like to clarify how you would/do get through such narrow=20
> passageways with standard DIR kit, I'd like to hear it. Purely out of=20
> academic interest, since I have no interest in diving in easy or difficult=
=20
> cave systems.
> Simon asked about helmets in cave diving. I posted a link to an article by=
=20
> some cave divers that says why they use them. He was free to read it and=20
> either think "Hey, good idea" or "What a bunch of garbage", and that would=
=20
> have been the end of it. But then you went and said "Just for laughs, tell=
=20
> us all why the helmets are used". I did so. I'm sorry to hear you didn't=20
> get=20
> the laughs you wanted.
> Regards
> Dominic
>=20
> >From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*>
> >Reply-To: <trey@ne*.co*>
> >To: "Dominic Humphries" <diverdominic@ho*.co*>,=20
> ><techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> >Subject: RE: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?
> >Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:12:53 -0500
> >
> >This is complete crap. You guys are so far off it is ridiculous - anythin=
g
> >to support your won flagrant stupidity. You come on over here to=20
> >Tallahassee
> >and tell me how "big, warm and easy access" Leon Sinks and the rest of ou=
r
> >systems are. You see videos we make in spring tunnels that feed conduit
> >caves. I know you take comfort in trying to say it looks easy to mask the
> >clown act that you guys perform, but the fact is we make it look easy and
> >none of you could get to first base in any cave relative to us using your
> >methods. Ask your big time British moron buddies who joined the USDCT and
> >tried to take us on in Wakulla with their British Bullshit methods,=20
> helmets
> >and all. If it is so big warm and easy, why did they use helmets? Because
> >they are morons. They spent 90 days trying to get to where I send an=20
> >advance
> >team to drop bottles and scooters, and missed more than half the cave, an=
d
> >took twice as long to go any distance they went. 90 days to get to where=20
> JJ
> >and I get in 90 minutes. Tell me about British cave diving so I can get a=
n
> >even bigger laugh. I guess limestone is different in the UK, water is
> >different there, and all of the other things are different to account for
> >the Mondo Bizzaro methods you ignoramuses use to do everything.
> >
> >Keep making excuses for your incompetent stupidity. I love the part about
> >"bashing your head". That fits for most of you guys because you have zero
> >technique or diving ability, have the worst gear mess possible, and=20
> operate
> >on pure ego and macho bravado trying to prove something, but only proving
> >how ridiculous your methods are.
> >
> >Helmets are for dry caving to keep things from falling on your head, not=20
> >for
> >keeping your head from hitting things.
> >
> >Only the worst moron would then put lights on the helmet or be stupid=20
> >enough
> >to store anything on the helmet. That is just beyond the pale stupid, but
> >standard stroke practice.
> >
> >You people have no system for anything other than "every man for himself"=
,
> >and that is well documented, and you can not tell me otherwise. You have
> >contributed nothing but comedy to the sport, and you never will doing it
> >your way. At the same time, you make up bullshit about us and excuses why
> >you can not do things that we do in our sleep.
> >
> >Tell me all about you "systems" for cave diving now and why they are
> >anything but bullshit. I notice that you guys always mention the WKPP in
> >every argument against the obvious and try to badmouth it. Come on over=20
> >here
> >like Stanton and his idiot pal Jason did, bring your best and brightest,
> >and let me make an ass out of you in spades , too.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Dominic Humphries [mailto:diverdominic@ho*.co*]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:21 AM
> >To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> >Subject: RE: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?
> >
> >
> >I didn't realise following a link was so hard. Still, the article in
> >question says:
> >Next, in the UK, we always wear helmets! We guarantee you that your head
> >gets bashed on the roof of the cave at least once during a dive, and in=20
> >some
> >of the smaller sumps, it will be constantly grinding against the rock=20
> roof.
> >
> >For a time-saver, here's the whole article:
> >Many people have now taken "cavern-diving" or "cave-diving" courses, and
> >dived in the warm, clear caves of such places as Mexico, Florida, Dordogn=
e=20
>=20
> >&
> >Majorca. These areas provide easy, interesting and pleasurable cave=20
> diving.
> >There are significant differences between those areas, and the UK.
> >Here are some things that we would tell anyone thinking of going=20
> >cave-diving
> >in the UK - things we think they should know...
> >Firstly, only a small proportion of the British Isles consists of the
> >limestone in which caves most commonly occur. Thus there are a very=20
> limited
> >number of cave-diving sites, and of these, only a handful have reasonably
> >easy physical access combined with roomy underwater passages and=20
> occasional
> >'good' (ie. more than 2 metres) visibility. Most of these would require=20
> you
> >to be a fully-fledged caver yourself, and you would need to have the
> >necessary ropes & ladders and know how to use them safely (including
> >competence in Single Rope Techniques - abseiling & prussiking). As some o=
f
> >the caves can be three miles from the road, several hundred feet deep,=20
> with
> >lengthy crawls and other obstacles, you would need to be able to muster a
> >team of cavers to carry your kit to the dive site. And of course you woul=
d
> >need to know where the cave entrance is!
> >Virtually all cave-diving sites are on private land. This means that
> >visitors must get the permission of the landowner before they visit. Some
> >landowners have installed physical barriers (eg. locked gates) to prevent
> >access, and may treat trespassers on their land to a close-up view of the
> >wrong end of a 12-bore! At some sites it may be that the landowner does=20
> not
> >care if people want to visit the cave (or indeed, they might prefer not t=
o
> >know of such a visit) but most of them just like to be asked nicely for
> >permission to visit the caves. Ignoring such etiquette may result in the
> >cave being closed permanently - guaranteeing you the hostility of all the
> >cave divers in the UK!
> >Realistically, the only way to find out about the current access
> >arrangements, would be to ask local active members of the CDG. They will
> >also have knowledge & experience of the effects of the weather on the cav=
e
> >in question, and whether the cave will be in flood, have good diving
> >conditions, what kind of visibility could be expected and what state the
> >guidelines are in, etc.
> >Most cave diving in the UK is carried out with the aim of exploring new
> >cave. Dives for the purpose of training/ testing of techniques & ancillar=
y
> >equipment are also carried out. Occasionally, when conditions allow it, a
> >few divers will do tourist/ pleasure dives. The dives recorded in the Cav=
e
> >Diving Group Newsletter reflect this pattern.
> >Most exploration is carried out by an individual or small group of divers
> >working together on a specific project, usually after researching geology=
/
> >hydrology, etc. and previous dives done at the site - via the relevant=20
> Sump
> >Index, CDG Newsletters & caving club journals. The divers will=20
> subsequently
> >publish their findings in the CDG Newsletter, or send them to its Editor=20
> >for
> >his =E2=80=98secret file=E2=80=99 (to be published at a later, more suita=
ble date) in=20
> order
> >to share these with the caving community at large. It is also expected=20
> that
> >a survey (plan & section) of any new discovery should be published with=20
> the
> >report in the CDG Newsletter. Etiquette dictates that other divers will=20
> not
> >'pirate' someone else's project while work continues. It is therefore the
> >individual's responsibility to let it be known that a project is taking
> >place, and, equally, when work is complete, to let people know that it's
> >'open season' again at the site in question.
> >For the safety and convenience of others, any diver who finds the lines i=
n
> >the sump in a different condition to those previously published, should
> >notify the changes to the Editor for inclusion in the Newsletter.
> >Now let=E2=80=99s look at gear & techniques. Many divers will have come a=
cross the
> >'Hogarthian'/ 'Doing It Right' philosophies promoted by the WKPP, GUE,
> >etc..... No argument - these principles are perfect for the large, deep,
> >easy-access springs, and the open water sites they dive. The value of the
> >techniques and gear configuration is reflected in the amazing exploration=
s
> >they have carried out with few accidents. As the old saying goes - the=20
> >proof
> >of the pudding....
> >Sadly, such gear configuration and techniques cannot be used in British=20
> >cave
> >diving. Let us explain why...
> >For a start, most sites in the UK are inaccessible to divers using
> >back-mounted bottles - quite simply, you would not fit through the cave
> >passages. Thus the long hose/ short hose debate, and where to put one=E2=
=80=99s
> >light, etc. does not arise. And you can leave the scooters at home! Here
> >streamlining is vital, and side-mounted tanks are de rigeur.
> >Although the water temperature is always cold (7 Celsius tops, 4 Celsius
> >normal), wetsuits are still commonly worn in many sumps. The bulk and
> >restricted movement of the drysuit for caving, and the likelihood of
> >overheating and damage, precludes its use in all but the easiest access
> >sites. Exceptions are the long deep sumps, a long way into a cave, when
> >ordinary caving gear is worn to get to dive site, with the drysuit being
> >carried and put on once the sump has been reached.
> >The streams in the caves are often heavily peat stained, and carry
> >substantial amounts of silt and organic debris - thus visibility of one t=
o
> >two metres is considered quite reasonable/ normal, and three to four=20
> metres
> >plus is excellent (but sadly very rare). Higher water flow rates also mea=
n
> >more wear and tear on the line, so 4mm thick is considered a minimum and=20
> >6mm
> >is not uncommon. We have even put half inch galvanised steel chain in one
> >cave, as the floods just kept eating 11mm caving rope! Consequently=20
> thicker
> >line means that line reels need to be fairly chunky/ heavy duty. The very
> >pretty aluminium and palstic enclosed reels you will see lots of =E2=80=
=98tekkie
> >diving=E2=80=99 shops flogging would probably last about five minutes in=20=
the UK-
> >plus you couldn=E2=80=99t get any proper line on them. The lovely thin so=
ft string
> >these reels come loaded with would be a menace in a UK sump.
> >Next, in the UK, we always wear helmets! We guarantee you that your head
> >gets bashed on the roof of the cave at least once during a dive, and in=20
> >some
> >of the smaller sumps, it will be constantly grinding against the rock=20
> roof.
> >It's also a handy thing to mount lights on - so you can see something
> >(albeit a brown glow and a line pressed against your mask) while you are
> >negotiating some of the less pleasant sumps. We normally wear two
> >twenty-watt lights, with 10 degree beams, plus two or more focusable
> >6-C-cell torches, on the helmet. Hand held lights and a bare head add up=20
> to
> >trouble over here ! Most UK cave divers will take a minimum of 5 differen=
t
> >light sources on a dive, and all of these will be helmet-mounted.
> >You are probably now beginning to realise why the Cave Diving Group=20
> members
> >may seem to discourage people from diving in caves in Britain. If the=20
> truth
> >be told, underwater caves in the UK can rarely be described as a pleasant
> >environment. Sure, you can get =E2=80=98job satisfaction=E2=80=99 from a=20=
well-executed=20
> >dive,
> >but do not expect to see what you see in the photos in glossy magazines..=
..
> >British sumps have a grim reputation. In response to the Brits being
> >impressed by his pushes, and the distances he explored - Olivier Isler=20
> once
> >commented: "Here in the Dordogne, the passages are large, the water is=20
> warm
> >& clear, so laying line here is easy. But I know in England the caves are
> >very small, the water is very cold, and you cannot see anything. Those ar=
e
> >very difficult & dangerous conditions." That from a man who has broken=20
> >World
> >cave-diving records.
> >So what else is different about cave diving in Britain?
> >Perhaps even more strange than the gear configuration, for many open-wate=
r
> >divers, is that you can forget about having a 'buddy' underwater in=20
> British
> >caves. Most cave divers in Britain believe that being solo in a sump is
> >safer for any number of reasons - such as:-
> > There's no-one to get physically jammed in the passage behind yo=
u
> >(thereby blocking your exit);
> > There's no-one behind you who may get tangled in the line, and=20
> >have
> >to cut it - leaving you with no guide home;
> > There's no-one to accidentally disturb your 'out tags' at line
> >junctions (e.g. in one cave there are 10 branch lines off the main line i=
n
> >the first 500m of passage);
> > There's no-one to cause silt problems (but yourself);
> > There's no chance of being called upon to share air - in small
> >passages thisThere's nothing to get confused about - communication in=20
> sumps
> >varies from the difficult to the impossible would be impossible anyway;
> > There's no-one to provide you with a false sense of security;
> > There's no-one to worry about, but yourself - you can concentrat=
e
> >on your own safety.
> >This all presumes, of course, that your gear is suitable and properly=20
> cared
> >for, and that you are fully proficient in all the techniques required.
> >But if this were not the case, you would be liability to yourself and any
> >buddy anyway.
> >A 'buddy' out of the water is, however, nice to have along - for the=20
> >company
> >(caves are lonely places), to help each other kit up, as a safety measure
> >against accidents such as slips, falls, etc. in the passages approaching=20
> >and
> >beyond the sumps, and to compare notes with afterwards regarding the=20
> nature
> >of the cave and possible leads. Similarly there may be odd occasions (e.g=
..
> >digging/ drilling & scaffolding) where you may be better working together
> >underwater.
> >One of the best things about bumping into other cave divers at a dive sit=
e
> >is to have a good look at their kit. What lights/ bottles/ harness/ reel=20
> do
> >they use? Why do they do what they do that way?
> >The same diver may well use different configurations at different dive
> >sites, and even on different occasions at the same site, depending on the
> >purpose of the dive. And they may well have come up with a wizard idea=20
> >which
> >they would love to share with you....
> >Adaptability and imagination are the hallmarks of cave divers. There are=20=
a
> >surprising number of items of home-made kit in use - generally more=20
> robust/
> >heavy-duty or cheap/ disposable than open water gear. Caves constitute a
> >very harsh environment, and thus equipment does not remain pristine for=20
> >long
> >- just notice most bottles, harnesses, helmets & lights in use. Sometimes
> >'normal' gear may be used, but adapted in particular way. We are also=20
> lucky
> >that we normally dive only in freshwater. This means that electric=20
> contacts
> >can be left open to the water - so you will see lights made diochroic=20
> units
> >& lawn mower plugs combined with leftover bits from the plumbers merchant=
s=20
>=20
> >-
> >and also mild steel bits & pieces hardly affected by rust. Most people=20
> will
> >be more than happy to explain their gear, and the hows, whys, and=20
> >wherefores
> >of why they use it. Put ten cave divers in a room with their kit, and
> >everyone will have his own way of doing it - each method refined to suit
> >it's user. Of course, they will all take the Mickey out of the other nine=
,
> >but then they will sneak off to try out someone else's ideas!
> >What they will not do, however, is to ram it down your throat and tell yo=
u
> >that theirs is the only way to do it! What is right is what is right for
> >you, to keep you safe and happy & get you back home in one piece. Just=20
> >think
> >carefully, first, about what you are doing, before you do it.
> >Jammed by your backmounts in a tiny passage, banging your (unhelmeted)=20
> head
> >against the roof, while trying to untie your handheld light & 17ft long=20
> >hose
> >from a 2mm white nylon line that's spilled off your beautifully engineere=
d
> >(but broken) plexiglass line reel, it will be small comfort to know that=20
> >you
> >are fully compliant with some well-publicised philosophy and gear
> >configuration that was developed for use in very different conditions.
> >Think of the Eastern European divers who refused to be beaten by a low mu=
d
> >filled sump, and finished up putting their bottles into a streamlined
> >container made from two child's plastic sledges - so they could push it
> >forward through the ooze in front of them, like a snow plough. What they=20
> >did
> >was right for them.
> >In the same way, CDG members are often seen to abandon their sidemounted
> >tanks when they are away on holiday, playing in the big, clear springs in
> >France, etc. - simply because it's easier carrying big bottles from the=20
> car
> >to the water on a back mount. Horses for courses.
> >Every member of the CDG has many years of 'dry' caving behind them before
> >they got to dive in a sump. They were not taught how to cave dive. With a
> >little help and advice from their friends, looking at how others go about
> >it, they learn. Watching, asking - but most importantly by THINKING - and
> >then cautiously trying out what they=E2=80=99ve learned for themselves.
> >This is the approach that we have taken for the last 60-odd years. That=
=E2=80=99s
> >why we had line laying techniques, good lights, gas management rules,
> >rebreathers and multiple redundancy years ago. But not content with that,
> >the innovations continued with mixed gasses, DPV=E2=80=99s, and gear adap=
tations=20
> by
> >the bucket load. We sat, we thought, then we went out & did - cautiously.
> >And we still do the same before & after every dive - always on the lookou=
t
> >for new ideas, techniques, equipment which we can use, or adapt, and
> >incorporate into what we do. Then we share our experience with others.
> >This is where the CDG helps. They are there to disseminate information an=
d
> >to try to share experience among cave divers in the UK. The CDG is a
> >non-profit making group of individuals with one common interest - the
> >exploration of caves. They do not run formal courses - training is very=20
> >much
> >on an ad hoc basis, with no commercial considerations whatsoever. To pass
> >through the grades to 'Qualified Diver' status may take years.
> >There are no shortcuts, and no amount of money can buy you the amount of
> >experience needed.
> >There are no 'ready made' courses which churn out 'Qualified' cave divers
> >and if some people seem to imply that their course will turn you into an
> >experienced UK cave diver - don't believe them! - there is no substitute=20
> >for
> >experience. Examining the accidents that have taken place in British sump=
s
> >shows that the vast majority of people drown within metres of an airspace=
,
> >and that they usually have limited experience.
> >So by all means go on that cavern or cave-diving course somewhere nice &
> >sunny abroad - it will hopefully give you an enjoyable and interesting
> >experience. Almost certainly the techniques you will learn, and the
> >discussions re: gear configuration, etc. will make you a better diver. Bu=
t
> >they are a world apart from what you would normally expect to find in a
> >British sump.
> >In the CDG's 'Qualified Diver' test, the candidate will be taken to a=20
> muddy
> >quarry and will be expected to lay line, navigate, survey, as well as
> >operate normally underwater like any other diver (i.e. breathing & ear
> >clearing, controlling buoyancy, and maintaining air margins). Additionall=
y
> >the diver will be given some manual dexterity test, and at various stages=
=20
> >he
> >will have his mask dislodged/ removed, usually after the examiner has
> >quietly turned off the candidate's reserve set, immediately followed by=20
> the
> >set he is using, whilst tangling him up in the line! If the diver copes=20
> >with
> >all this without approaching the incident pit, and can later satisfy the
> >examiner with his technical knowledge, then he can be put forward for
> >qualification. Even then, the candidate must be elected to 'Qualified=20
> >Diver'
> >status by his peers in the CDG.
> >And, sadly, this is still no guarantee of invulnerability in the sump.=20
> >There
> >are few more frightening experiences than being lost in a sump, or
> >physically stuck, or having a catastrophic gear failure. Air may be only
> >metres away - or kilometres - but if you can't reach it when you need
> >it.....
> >To dive safely in the caves of Britain requires careful thought and
> >planning, a thorough understanding of caves & caving, training, the right
> >equipment, and the right mental attitude.
> >So let's close with a few words from the CDG Manual :-
> >'Cave diving calls for complete self-reliance and independence of=20
> >judgement,
> >which does not imply ignoring the experience of others=E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6t=
he divers
> >responsibility for safety is his and his alone, if he delegates
> >responsibility for any part of the operation, he does so at his own
> >risk=E2=80=A6..he should examine his motivation for cave diving=E2=80=A6=
=E2=80=A6.he must to a=20
> >great
> >extent live cave diving as well as practice it=E2=80=A6..this is a hard d=
octrine=20
> to
> >accept, nevertheless it is one born of experience.'
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*>
> > >Reply-To: <trey@ne*.co*>
> > >To: "Dominic Humphries" <diverdominic@ho*.co*>,
> > ><techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> > >Subject: RE: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?
> > >Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:39:58 -0500
> > >
> > >Just for laughs, tell us all why the helmets are used. This should be a
> > >keeper.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Dominic Humphries [mailto:diverdominic@ho*.co*]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:21 AM
> > >To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> > >Subject: Re: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?
> > >
> > >
> > >The cave-diving group here in the UK always use helmets, you may find=20
> >this
> > >article on their equipment worth a look:
> > >http://www.cavedivinggroup.org.uk/Essays/Scoff.html
> > >Regards
> > >Dominic
> > >
> > > >From: Simon L Hartley <shartley@sc*.ed*.au*>
> > > >To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> > > >Subject: Helmets for cave diving.  What's the deal?
> > > >Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 16:08:17 +1100
> > > >
> > > >While we're on the subject of genuine risk and paranoia.  I'm doing a
> > > >Cavern/Sinkhole course in a few weeks.  One thing I've noticed is tha=
t
> > >many
> > > >of the pictures of cave divers in Aus show them using helmets.  I=20
> don't
> > > >know this for sure but the use of helmets seems a likely topic to=20
> arise
> > >and
> > > >I may even be required to wear one (for at least some parts of a=20
> cavern
> > > >course (not sure)). If this is going to be a problem I'd like to know
> > >about
> > > >it.  From what I've seen the WKPP don't use helmets (I assume they ar=
e
> > >not
> > > >DIR and may not fit well with the system).  What is the deal?  I can
> > >think
> > > >of a couple of possible problems right away including...
> > > >
> > > >1) May interfere with deployment of long hose.
> > > >
> > > >2) Obvious problems with helmet/head mounted lights (blind everyone=20
> you
> > > >look at, can't hide light to look for buddies, can't signal with=20
> >lights,
> > > >light heads and cables (maybe canisters too) are behind your head so
> > >can't
> > > >deal with problems).
> > > >
> > > >.....yet I imagine for abseiling into a cavern and in the dry parts=20
> >under
> > > >ledges, etc there is the risk of rocks/equipment falling on you. =20
> >What's
> > > >the deal?
> > > >
> > > >Any help appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >
> > > >Simon
> > > >
> > > >Simon L Hartley
> > > >EnvSM Website Coordinator\First Year Course Coordinator
> > > >Associate Lecturer
> > > >School of Environmental Science and Management
> > > >Southern Cross University
> > > >P.O. Box 157
> > > >Lismore NSW, Australia 2480
> > > >Ph: (02) 66203251 or (61 66) 203 251
> > > >Fax:(02) 66212669
> > > >E-mail: shartley@sc*.ed*.au*
> > > >
> > > >http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/esm/staff/pages/shartley/
> >


Visit my web page with underwater and other photos at=20
http://members.aol.com/jsuw3/index.html

--part1_a2.1f11ea10.2971ac31_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT  COLOR=3D"#800040" SIZE=3D2
FAMILY=
=3D"SCRIPT" FACE=3D"Comic Sans MS" LANG=3D"0">I have never done sidemount, s=
o I can't speak to that, but I can say that I've seen a number of these disc=
ussions where one group or individual loudly says that DIR will not work in=20=
their environment, only to finally come to the conclusion that there is no r=
eason it won't.  Not only that, but it probably will streamline, simpli=
fy, and make safer what is done.<BR>
<BR>
I have a feeling if those that insist that DIR will not work in this environ=
ment truly have an idea of what DIR means, then they would adopt it, and fin=
d that it works better than their current approach.  Change is often di=
fficult to accept.  DIR would look at changes to equipment configuratio=
n, teamwork, and attitude.  A first step is admitting that there is roo=
m for improvement in what is currently being done.<BR>
<BR>
Jan S.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 1/11/02 10:20:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, diverdominic@h=
otmail.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
SIZE=3D2=
 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I have just one question:<BR>
Why do you keep saying "You"? I'm not a cave diver, here or anywhere else. I=
 <BR>
thought the way I referred to the CDG as "them" rather than "us" would have=20=
<BR>
made that clear.<BR>
I came across the article I posted a while ago, and found it an interesting=20=
<BR>
one. It's the only place I've come across that doesn't just say "Our <BR>
approach is just as good as DIR" but actually goes so far as to say "DIR <BR=
>
wouldn't work here." And having seen some of the photos in their gallery <BR=
>
page, such as <BR>
http://www.cavedivinggroup.org.uk/images/Photos/BBC/pages/Gary_gif.htm I <BR=
>
found it hard to refute their argument that backmounts wouldn't work, or <BR=
>
that it would be very hard to pass a reg to someone behind you in some of <B=
R>
the caves they dive in.<BR>
If you'd like to clarify how you would/do get through such narrow <BR>
passageways with standard DIR kit, I'd like to hear it. Purely out of <BR>
academic interest, since I have no interest in diving in easy or difficult <=
BR>
cave systems.<BR>
Simon asked about helmets in cave diving. I posted a link to an article by <=
BR>
some cave divers that says why they use them. He was free to read it and <BR=
>
either think "Hey, good idea" or "What a bunch of garbage", and that would <=
BR>
have been the end of it. But then you went and said "Just for laughs, tell <=
BR>
us all why the helmets are used". I did so. I'm sorry to hear you didn't get=
 <BR>
the laughs you wanted.<BR>
Regards<BR>
Dominic<BR>
<BR>
>From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*><BR>
>Reply-To: <trey@ne*.co*><BR>
>To: "Dominic Humphries" <diverdominic@ho*.co*>, <BR>
><techdiver@aquanaut.com><BR>
>Subject: RE: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?<BR>
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:12:53 -0500<BR>
><BR>
>This is complete crap. You guys are so far off it is ridiculous - anythi=
ng<BR>
>to support your won flagrant stupidity. You come on over here to <BR>
>Tallahassee<BR>
>and tell me how "big, warm and easy access" Leon Sinks and the rest of o=
ur<BR>
>systems are. You see videos we make in spring tunnels that feed conduit<=
BR>
>caves. I know you take comfort in trying to say it looks easy to mask th=
e<BR>
>clown act that you guys perform, but the fact is we make it look easy an=
d<BR>
>none of you could get to first base in any cave relative to us using you=
r<BR>
>methods. Ask your big time British moron buddies who joined the USDCT an=
d<BR>
>tried to take us on in Wakulla with their British Bullshit methods, helm=
ets<BR>
>and all. If it is so big warm and easy, why did they use helmets? Becaus=
e<BR>
>they are morons. They spent 90 days trying to get to where I send an <BR=
>
>advance<BR>
>team to drop bottles and scooters, and missed more than half the cave, a=
nd<BR>
>took twice as long to go any distance they went. 90 days to get to where=
 JJ<BR>
>and I get in 90 minutes. Tell me about British cave diving so I can get=20=
an<BR>
>even bigger laugh. I guess limestone is different in the UK, water is<BR=
>
>different there, and all of the other things are different to account fo=
r<BR>
>the Mondo Bizzaro methods you ignoramuses use to do everything.<BR>
><BR>
>Keep making excuses for your incompetent stupidity. I love the part abou=
t<BR>
>"bashing your head". That fits for most of you guys because you have zer=
o<BR>
>technique or diving ability, have the worst gear mess possible, and oper=
ate<BR>
>on pure ego and macho bravado trying to prove something, but only provin=
g<BR>
>how ridiculous your methods are.<BR>
><BR>
>Helmets are for dry caving to keep things from falling on your head, not=
 <BR>
>for<BR>
>keeping your head from hitting things.<BR>
><BR>
>Only the worst moron would then put lights on the helmet or be stupid <B=
R>
>enough<BR>
>to store anything on the helmet. That is just beyond the pale stupid, bu=
t<BR>
>standard stroke practice.<BR>
><BR>
>You people have no system for anything other than "every man for himself=
",<BR>
>and that is well documented, and you can not tell me otherwise. You have=
<BR>
>contributed nothing but comedy to the sport, and you never will doing it=
<BR>
>your way. At the same time, you make up bullshit about us and excuses wh=
y<BR>
>you can not do things that we do in our sleep.<BR>
><BR>
>Tell me all about you "systems" for cave diving now and why they are<BR>
>anything but bullshit. I notice that you guys always mention the WKPP in=
<BR>
>every argument against the obvious and try to badmouth it. Come on over=20=
<BR>
>here<BR>
>like Stanton and his idiot pal Jason did, bring your best and brightest,=
<BR>
>and let me make an ass out of you in spades , too.<BR>
><BR>
>-----Original Message-----<BR>
>From: Dominic Humphries [mailto:diverdominic@ho*.co*]<BR>
>Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:21 AM<BR>
>To: techdiver@aquanaut.com<BR>
>Subject: RE: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>I didn't realise following a link was so hard. Still, the article in<BR>
>question says:<BR>
>Next, in the UK, we always wear helmets! We guarantee you that your head=
<BR>
>gets bashed on the roof of the cave at least once during a dive, and in=20=
<BR>
>some<BR>
>of the smaller sumps, it will be constantly grinding against the rock ro=
of.<BR>
><BR>
>For a time-saver, here's the whole article:<BR>
>Many people have now taken "cavern-diving" or "cave-diving" courses, and=
<BR>
>dived in the warm, clear caves of such places as Mexico, Florida, Dordog=
ne <BR>
>&<BR>
>Majorca. These areas provide easy, interesting and pleasurable cave divi=
ng.<BR>
>There are significant differences between those areas, and the UK.<BR>
>Here are some things that we would tell anyone thinking of going <BR>
>cave-diving<BR>
>in the UK - things we think they should know...<BR>
>Firstly, only a small proportion of the British Isles consists of the<BR=
>
>limestone in which caves most commonly occur. Thus there are a very limi=
ted<BR>
>number of cave-diving sites, and of these, only a handful have reasonabl=
y<BR>
>easy physical access combined with roomy underwater passages and occasio=
nal<BR>
>'good' (ie. more than 2 metres) visibility. Most of these would require=20=
you<BR>
>to be a fully-fledged caver yourself, and you would need to have the<BR>
>necessary ropes & ladders and know how to use them safely (including=
<BR>
>competence in Single Rope Techniques - abseiling & prussiking). As s=
ome of<BR>
>the caves can be three miles from the road, several hundred feet deep, w=
ith<BR>
>lengthy crawls and other obstacles, you would need to be able to muster=20=
a<BR>
>team of cavers to carry your kit to the dive site. And of course you wou=
ld<BR>
>need to know where the cave entrance is!<BR>
>Virtually all cave-diving sites are on private land. This means that<BR>
>visitors must get the permission of the landowner before they visit. Som=
e<BR>
>landowners have installed physical barriers (eg. locked gates) to preven=
t<BR>
>access, and may treat trespassers on their land to a close-up view of th=
e<BR>
>wrong end of a 12-bore! At some sites it may be that the landowner does=20=
not<BR>
>care if people want to visit the cave (or indeed, they might prefer not=20=
to<BR>
>know of such a visit) but most of them just like to be asked nicely for<=
BR>
>permission to visit the caves. Ignoring such etiquette may result in the=
<BR>
>cave being closed permanently - guaranteeing you the hostility of all th=
e<BR>
>cave divers in the UK!<BR>
>Realistically, the only way to find out about the current access<BR>
>arrangements, would be to ask local active members of the CDG. They will=
<BR>
>also have knowledge & experience of the effects of the weather on th=
e cave<BR>
>in question, and whether the cave will be in flood, have good diving<BR>
>conditions, what kind of visibility could be expected and what state the=
<BR>
>guidelines are in, etc.<BR>
>Most cave diving in the UK is carried out with the aim of exploring new<=
BR>
>cave. Dives for the purpose of training/ testing of techniques & anc=
illary<BR>
>equipment are also carried out. Occasionally, when conditions allow it,=20=
a<BR>
>few divers will do tourist/ pleasure dives. The dives recorded in the Ca=
ve<BR>
>Diving Group Newsletter reflect this pattern.<BR>
>Most exploration is carried out by an individual or small group of diver=
s<BR>
>working together on a specific project, usually after researching geolog=
y/<BR>
>hydrology, etc. and previous dives done at the site - via the relevant S=
ump<BR>
>Index, CDG Newsletters & caving club journals. The divers will subse=
quently<BR>
>publish their findings in the CDG Newsletter, or send them to its Editor=
 <BR>
>for<BR>
>his =E2=80=98secret file=E2=80=99 (to be published at a later, more suit=
able date) in order<BR>
>to share these with the caving community at large. It is also expected t=
hat<BR>
>a survey (plan & section) of any new discovery should be published w=
ith the<BR>
>report in the CDG Newsletter. Etiquette dictates that other divers will=20=
not<BR>
>'pirate' someone else's project while work continues. It is therefore th=
e<BR>
>individual's responsibility to let it be known that a project is taking<=
BR>
>place, and, equally, when work is complete, to let people know that it's=
<BR>
>'open season' again at the site in question.<BR>
>For the safety and convenience of others, any diver who finds the lines=20=
in<BR>
>the sump in a different condition to those previously published, should<=
BR>
>notify the changes to the Editor for inclusion in the Newsletter.<BR>
>Now let=E2=80=99s look at gear & techniques. Many divers will have c=
ome across the<BR>
>'Hogarthian'/ 'Doing It Right' philosophies promoted by the WKPP, GUE,<B=
R>
>etc..... No argument - these principles are perfect for the large, deep,=
<BR>
>easy-access springs, and the open water sites they dive. The value of th=
e<BR>
>techniques and gear configuration is reflected in the amazing exploratio=
ns<BR>
>they have carried out with few accidents. As the old saying goes - the <=
BR>
>proof<BR>
>of the pudding....<BR>
>Sadly, such gear configuration and techniques cannot be used in British=20=
<BR>
>cave<BR>
>diving. Let us explain why...<BR>
>For a start, most sites in the UK are inaccessible to divers using<BR>
>back-mounted bottles - quite simply, you would not fit through the cave<=
BR>
>passages. Thus the long hose/ short hose debate, and where to put one=
=E2=80=99s<BR>
>light, etc. does not arise. And you can leave the scooters at home! Here=
<BR>
>streamlining is vital, and side-mounted tanks are de rigeur.<BR>
>Although the water temperature is always cold (7 Celsius tops, 4 Celsius=
<BR>
>normal), wetsuits are still commonly worn in many sumps. The bulk and<BR=
>
>restricted movement of the drysuit for caving, and the likelihood of<BR>
>overheating and damage, precludes its use in all but the easiest access<=
BR>
>sites. Exceptions are the long deep sumps, a long way into a cave, when<=
BR>
>ordinary caving gear is worn to get to dive site, with the drysuit being=
<BR>
>carried and put on once the sump has been reached.<BR>
>The streams in the caves are often heavily peat stained, and carry<BR>
>substantial amounts of silt and organic debris - thus visibility of one=20=
to<BR>
>two metres is considered quite reasonable/ normal, and three to four met=
res<BR>
>plus is excellent (but sadly very rare). Higher water flow rates also me=
an<BR>
>more wear and tear on the line, so 4mm thick is considered a minimum and=
 <BR>
>6mm<BR>
>is not uncommon. We have even put half inch galvanised steel chain in on=
e<BR>
>cave, as the floods just kept eating 11mm caving rope! Consequently thic=
ker<BR>
>line means that line reels need to be fairly chunky/ heavy duty. The ver=
y<BR>
>pretty aluminium and palstic enclosed reels you will see lots of =E2=80=
=98tekkie<BR>
>diving=E2=80=99 shops flogging would probably last about five minutes in=
 the UK-<BR>
>plus you couldn=E2=80=99t get any proper line on them. The lovely thin s=
oft string<BR>
>these reels come loaded with would be a menace in a UK sump.<BR>
>Next, in the UK, we always wear helmets! We guarantee you that your head=
<BR>
>gets bashed on the roof of the cave at least once during a dive, and in=20=
<BR>
>some<BR>
>of the smaller sumps, it will be constantly grinding against the rock ro=
of.<BR>
>It's also a handy thing to mount lights on - so you can see something<BR=
>
>(albeit a brown glow and a line pressed against your mask) while you are=
<BR>
>negotiating some of the less pleasant sumps. We normally wear two<BR>
>twenty-watt lights, with 10 degree beams, plus two or more focusable<BR>
>6-C-cell torches, on the helmet. Hand held lights and a bare head add up=
 to<BR>
>trouble over here ! Most UK cave divers will take a minimum of 5 differe=
nt<BR>
>light sources on a dive, and all of these will be helmet-mounted.<BR>
>You are probably now beginning to realise why the Cave Diving Group memb=
ers<BR>
>may seem to discourage people from diving in caves in Britain. If the tr=
uth<BR>
>be told, underwater caves in the UK can rarely be described as a pleasan=
t<BR>
>environment. Sure, you can get =E2=80=98job satisfaction=E2=80=99 from a=
 well-executed <BR>
>dive,<BR>
>but do not expect to see what you see in the photos in glossy magazines.=
...<BR>
>British sumps have a grim reputation. In response to the Brits being<BR>
>impressed by his pushes, and the distances he explored - Olivier Isler o=
nce<BR>
>commented: "Here in the Dordogne, the passages are large, the water is w=
arm<BR>
>& clear, so laying line here is easy. But I know in England the cave=
s are<BR>
>very small, the water is very cold, and you cannot see anything. Those a=
re<BR>
>very difficult & dangerous conditions." That from a man who has brok=
en <BR>
>World<BR>
>cave-diving records.<BR>
>So what else is different about cave diving in Britain?<BR>
>Perhaps even more strange than the gear configuration, for many open-wat=
er<BR>
>divers, is that you can forget about having a 'buddy' underwater in Brit=
ish<BR>
>caves. Most cave divers in Britain believe that being solo in a sump is<=
BR>
>safer for any number of reasons - such as:-<BR>
>&#61623; There's no-one to get physically jammed in the passage behi=
nd you<BR>
>(thereby blocking your exit);<BR>
>&#61623; There's no-one behind you who may get tangled in the line,=20=
and <BR>
>have<BR>
>to cut it - leaving you with no guide home;<BR>
>&#61623; There's no-one to accidentally disturb your 'out tags' at l=
ine<BR>
>junctions (e.g. in one cave there are 10 branch lines off the main line=20=
in<BR>
>the first 500m of passage);<BR>
>&#61623; There's no-one to cause silt problems (but yourself);<BR>
>&#61623; There's no chance of being called upon to share air - in sm=
all<BR>
>passages thisThere's nothing to get confused about - communication in su=
mps<BR>
>varies from the difficult to the impossible would be impossible anyway;<=
BR>
>&#61623; There's no-one to provide you with a false sense of securit=
y;<BR>
>&#61623; There's no-one to worry about, but yourself - you can conce=
ntrate<BR>
>on your own safety.<BR>
>This all presumes, of course, that your gear is suitable and properly ca=
red<BR>
>for, and that you are fully proficient in all the techniques required.<B=
R>
>But if this were not the case, you would be liability to yourself and an=
y<BR>
>buddy anyway.<BR>
>A 'buddy' out of the water is, however, nice to have along - for the <BR=
>
>company<BR>
>(caves are lonely places), to help each other kit up, as a safety measur=
e<BR>
>against accidents such as slips, falls, etc. in the passages approaching=
 <BR>
>and<BR>
>beyond the sumps, and to compare notes with afterwards regarding the nat=
ure<BR>
>of the cave and possible leads. Similarly there may be odd occasions (e.=
g.<BR>
>digging/ drilling & scaffolding) where you may be better working tog=
ether<BR>
>underwater.<BR>
>One of the best things about bumping into other cave divers at a dive si=
te<BR>
>is to have a good look at their kit. What lights/ bottles/ harness/ reel=
 do<BR>
>they use? Why do they do what they do that way?<BR>
>The same diver may well use different configurations at different dive<B=
R>
>sites, and even on different occasions at the same site, depending on th=
e<BR>
>purpose of the dive. And they may well have come up with a wizard idea <=
BR>
>which<BR>
>they would love to share with you....<BR>
>Adaptability and imagination are the hallmarks of cave divers. There are=
 a<BR>
>surprising number of items of home-made kit in use - generally more robu=
st/<BR>
>heavy-duty or cheap/ disposable than open water gear. Caves constitute a=
<BR>
>very harsh environment, and thus equipment does not remain pristine for=20=
<BR>
>long<BR>
>- just notice most bottles, harnesses, helmets & lights in use. Some=
times<BR>
>'normal' gear may be used, but adapted in particular way. We are also lu=
cky<BR>
>that we normally dive only in freshwater. This means that electric conta=
cts<BR>
>can be left open to the water - so you will see lights made diochroic un=
its<BR>
>& lawn mower plugs combined with leftover bits from the plumbers mer=
chants <BR>
>-<BR>
>and also mild steel bits & pieces hardly affected by rust. Most peop=
le will<BR>
>be more than happy to explain their gear, and the hows, whys, and <BR>
>wherefores<BR>
>of why they use it. Put ten cave divers in a room with their kit, and<BR=
>
>everyone will have his own way of doing it - each method refined to suit=
<BR>
>it's user. Of course, they will all take the Mickey out of the other nin=
e,<BR>
>but then they will sneak off to try out someone else's ideas!<BR>
>What they will not do, however, is to ram it down your throat and tell y=
ou<BR>
>that theirs is the only way to do it! What is right is what is right for=
<BR>
>you, to keep you safe and happy & get you back home in one piece. Ju=
st <BR>
>think<BR>
>carefully, first, about what you are doing, before you do it.<BR>
>Jammed by your backmounts in a tiny passage, banging your (unhelmeted) h=
ead<BR>
>against the roof, while trying to untie your handheld light & 17ft l=
ong <BR>
>hose<BR>
>from a 2mm white nylon line that's spilled off your beautifully engineer=
ed<BR>
>(but broken) plexiglass line reel, it will be small comfort to know that=
 <BR>
>you<BR>
>are fully compliant with some well-publicised philosophy and gear<BR>
>configuration that was developed for use in very different conditions.<B=
R>
>Think of the Eastern European divers who refused to be beaten by a low m=
ud<BR>
>filled sump, and finished up putting their bottles into a streamlined<BR=
>
>container made from two child's plastic sledges - so they could push it<=
BR>
>forward through the ooze in front of them, like a snow plough. What they=
 <BR>
>did<BR>
>was right for them.<BR>
>In the same way, CDG members are often seen to abandon their sidemounted=
<BR>
>tanks when they are away on holiday, playing in the big, clear springs i=
n<BR>
>France, etc. - simply because it's easier carrying big bottles from the=20=
car<BR>
>to the water on a back mount. Horses for courses.<BR>
>Every member of the CDG has many years of 'dry' caving behind them befor=
e<BR>
>they got to dive in a sump. They were not taught how to cave dive. With=20=
a<BR>
>little help and advice from their friends, looking at how others go abou=
t<BR>
>it, they learn. Watching, asking - but most importantly by THINKING - an=
d<BR>
>then cautiously trying out what they=E2=80=99ve learned for themselves.<=
BR>
>This is the approach that we have taken for the last 60-odd years. That=
=E2=80=99s<BR>
>why we had line laying techniques, good lights, gas management rules,<BR=
>
>rebreathers and multiple redundancy years ago. But not content with that=
,<BR>
>the innovations continued with mixed gasses, DPV=E2=80=99s, and gear ada=
ptations by<BR>
>the bucket load. We sat, we thought, then we went out & did - cautio=
usly.<BR>
>And we still do the same before & after every dive - always on the l=
ookout<BR>
>for new ideas, techniques, equipment which we can use, or adapt, and<BR>
>incorporate into what we do. Then we share our experience with others.<B=
R>
>This is where the CDG helps. They are there to disseminate information a=
nd<BR>
>to try to share experience among cave divers in the UK. The CDG is a<BR>
>non-profit making group of individuals with one common interest - the<BR=
>
>exploration of caves. They do not run formal courses - training is very=20=
<BR>
>much<BR>
>on an ad hoc basis, with no commercial considerations whatsoever. To pas=
s<BR>
>through the grades to 'Qualified Diver' status may take years.<BR>
>There are no shortcuts, and no amount of money can buy you the amount of=
<BR>
>experience needed.<BR>
>There are no 'ready made' courses which churn out 'Qualified' cave diver=
s<BR>
>and if some people seem to imply that their course will turn you into an=
<BR>
>experienced UK cave diver - don't believe them! - there is no substitute=
 <BR>
>for<BR>
>experience. Examining the accidents that have taken place in British sum=
ps<BR>
>shows that the vast majority of people drown within metres of an airspac=
e,<BR>
>and that they usually have limited experience.<BR>
>So by all means go on that cavern or cave-diving course somewhere nice &=
amp;<BR>
>sunny abroad - it will hopefully give you an enjoyable and interesting<B=
R>
>experience. Almost certainly the techniques you will learn, and the<BR>
>discussions re: gear configuration, etc. will make you a better diver. B=
ut<BR>
>they are a world apart from what you would normally expect to find in a<=
BR>
>British sump.<BR>
>In the CDG's 'Qualified Diver' test, the candidate will be taken to a mu=
ddy<BR>
>quarry and will be expected to lay line, navigate, survey, as well as<BR=
>
>operate normally underwater like any other diver (i.e. breathing & e=
ar<BR>
>clearing, controlling buoyancy, and maintaining air margins). Additional=
ly<BR>
>the diver will be given some manual dexterity test, and at various stage=
s <BR>
>he<BR>
>will have his mask dislodged/ removed, usually after the examiner has<BR=
>
>quietly turned off the candidate's reserve set, immediately followed by=20=
the<BR>
>set he is using, whilst tangling him up in the line! If the diver copes=20=
<BR>
>with<BR>
>all this without approaching the incident pit, and can later satisfy the=
<BR>
>examiner with his technical knowledge, then he can be put forward for<BR=
>
>qualification. Even then, the candidate must be elected to 'Qualified <B=
R>
>Diver'<BR>
>status by his peers in the CDG.<BR>
>And, sadly, this is still no guarantee of invulnerability in the sump. <=
BR>
>There<BR>
>are few more frightening experiences than being lost in a sump, or<BR>
>physically stuck, or having a catastrophic gear failure. Air may be only=
<BR>
>metres away - or kilometres - but if you can't reach it when you need<BR=
>
>it.....<BR>
>To dive safely in the caves of Britain requires careful thought and<BR>
>planning, a thorough understanding of caves & caving, training, the=20=
right<BR>
>equipment, and the right mental attitude.<BR>
>So let's close with a few words from the CDG Manual :-<BR>
>'Cave diving calls for complete self-reliance and independence of <BR>
>judgement,<BR>
>which does not imply ignoring the experience of others=E2=80=A6=E2=80=
=A6the divers<BR>
>responsibility for safety is his and his alone, if he delegates<BR>
>responsibility for any part of the operation, he does so at his own<BR>
>risk=E2=80=A6..he should examine his motivation for cave diving=E2=80=
=A6=E2=80=A6.he must to a <BR>
>great<BR>
>extent live cave diving as well as practice it=E2=80=A6..this is a hard=20=
doctrine to<BR>
>accept, nevertheless it is one born of experience.'<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> >From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*><BR>
> >Reply-To: <trey@ne*.co*><BR>
> >To: "Dominic Humphries" <diverdominic@ho*.co*>,<BR>
> ><techdiver@aquanaut.com><BR>
> >Subject: RE: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?<BR>
> >Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:39:58 -0500<BR>
> ><BR>
> >Just for laughs, tell us all why the helmets are used. This should=20=
be a<BR>
> >keeper.<BR>
> ><BR>
> >-----Original Message-----<BR>
> >From: Dominic Humphries [mailto:diverdominic@ho*.co*]<BR>
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:21 AM<BR>
> >To: techdiver@aquanaut.com<BR>
> >Subject: Re: Helmets for cave diving. What's the deal?<BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> >The cave-diving group here in the UK always use helmets, you may fi=
nd <BR>
>this<BR>
> >article on their equipment worth a look:<BR>
> >http://www.cavedivinggroup.org.uk/Essays/Scoff.html<BR>
> >Regards<BR>
> >Dominic<BR>
> ><BR>
> > >From: Simon L Hartley <shartley@sc*.ed*.au*><BR>
> > >To: techdiver@aquanaut.com<BR>
> > >Subject: Helmets for cave diving.  What's the deal?<BR>
> > >Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 16:08:17 +1100<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >While we're on the subject of genuine risk and paranoia. =
 I'm doing a<BR>
> > >Cavern/Sinkhole course in a few weeks.  One thing I've no=
ticed is that<BR>
> >many<BR>
> > >of the pictures of cave divers in Aus show them using helmets.=
  I don't<BR>
> > >know this for sure but the use of helmets seems a likely topic=
 to arise<BR>
> >and<BR>
> > >I may even be required to wear one (for at least some parts of=
 a cavern<BR>
> > >course (not sure)). If this is going to be a problem I'd like=20=
to know<BR>
> >about<BR>
> > >it.  From what I've seen the WKPP don't use helmets (I as=
sume they are<BR>
> >not<BR>
> > >DIR and may not fit well with the system).  What is the d=
eal?  I can<BR>
> >think<BR>
> > >of a couple of possible problems right away including...<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >1) May interfere with deployment of long hose.<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >2) Obvious problems with helmet/head mounted lights (blind eve=
ryone you<BR>
> > >look at, can't hide light to look for buddies, can't signal wi=
th <BR>
>lights,<BR>
> > >light heads and cables (maybe canisters too) are behind your h=
ead so<BR>
> >can't<BR>
> > >deal with problems).<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >.....yet I imagine for abseiling into a cavern and in the dry=20=
parts <BR>
>under<BR>
> > >ledges, etc there is the risk of rocks/equipment falling on yo=
u.  <BR>
>What's<BR>
> > >the deal?<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >Any help appreciated.<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >Cheers,<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >Simon<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >Simon L Hartley<BR>
> > >EnvSM Website Coordinator\First Year Course Coordinator<BR>
> > >Associate Lecturer<BR>
> > >School of Environmental Science and Management<BR>
> > >Southern Cross University<BR>
> > >P.O. Box 157<BR>
> > >Lismore NSW, Australia 2480<BR>
> > >Ph: (02) 66203251 or (61 66) 203 251<BR>
> > >Fax:(02) 66212669<BR>
> > >E-mail: shartley@sc*.ed*.au*<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/esm/staff/pages/shartley/<BR>
></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#800040" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
SIZE=3D2=
 FAMILY=3D"SCRIPT" FACE=3D"Comic Sans MS" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
<BR>
<B>Visit my web page with underwater and other photos at http://members.aol.=
com/jsuw3/index.html</B></FONT></HTML>

--part1_a2.1f11ea10.2971ac31_boundary--
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]