Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:34:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Esat Atikkan <atikkan@ya*.co*>
Subject: RE: Oxygen Clock
To: Trey <trey@ne*.co*>, "Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Chemically?
He is indeed a true inert gas (OK won't go into
electrons & orbitals) :->  Hint ammonia is a N2
compound.

Physiologically - hope U bone up on this important
area, as N2 is not inert at higher partial pressures &
U don't even have to go to that high ppN2 to feel it.

He - well for all intents & purposes is
physiologically inert in the sense of He narcosis.

Now when it comes to HPNS, we have a different kettle
of fish, but still the statemnet N2 is less inert than
He is valid, in particular if chem reactivity or
narcosis potential R the issues.

Safe bubbles
Esat ATikkan

--- "David E. Smith" <dsmith218@ho*.co*> wrote:
> Trey,
> In what manner is nitrogen not inert as compared to
> helium?  I think this is the first I have heard
> that.
> 
> Also, do you not subscribe to the notion that other
> gases' presence in an O2 environment makes you less
> susceptible to a CNS 02 tox?  (e.g.  50/50 at 1.6ata
> is more forgiving than 100% at 1.6ata)  I won't tell
> you where I learned that <g>, but I don't believe
> the reason why (IF it is even true) was understood.
> So I can't argue one way or the other with any
> credibility.
> 
> David E. Smith
> 
> God Bless America!
> Hunt and Punish! Dead or Alive!
> We are coming for you!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trey [mailto:trey@ne*.co*]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:34 AM
> To: Ferry Ouwerkerk; Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com;
> Quest@Gu*. Com
> Subject: RE: Oxygen Clock
> 
> 
> 
>  Helium has no effect as to the offgassing part of
> deco it and of itself.
> The sum of the inert gases is merely the opposite of
> the oxygen window. All
> that matters in this sense is the window applied
> with the toggling effect I
> described.
> 
>  What is key with helium and why in real life it
> does shorten deco is that
> 1) you do not get the damage with helium that you
> get with nitrogen, 2) it
> is far easier to breathe and causes you to develop
> less co2, 3) it is truly
> inert unlike nitrogen, 4) it lowers the narcotic
> effect and makes you more
> alert, 5) it does not precipitate the immune
> reaction that high partial
> pressures of nitrogen do and forms smaller bubbles,
> 6) it comes out of
> tissues more easily.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferry Ouwerkerk
> [mailto:f.ouwerkerk@qu*.nl*]
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 4:50 PM
> To: Trey
> Subject: Re: Oxygen Clock
> 
> 
> George,
> 
> Do helium based deco mixtures affect the
> deco-profile in any way, or can you
> us the software generated profile based on nitrox
> based deco gasses and jus
> do the breaks when nesscary?
> 
> thanks,
> Ferry
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trey" <trey@ne*.co*>
> To: "Charles Roth" <divr555@ho*.co*>;
> <techdiver@aquanaut.com>;
> "Quest@Gu*. Com" <quest@gu*.co*>
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 2:52 PM
> Subject: RE: Oxygen Clock
> 
> 
> >
> >  The short version of the answer is that we came
> up with this ( 12 on , 6
> > off )by trying everything and arriving at that. We
> knew from any of our
> > diving that long exposures to higher ppo2s left us
> feeling like we had a
> > chest cold. We started out with the usual crap
> that is taught out there
>  20
> > on then break ) and found that to be useless. We
> found loss of vital
> > capacity with these regimens.  Now we have no such
> negative results.
> >
> >  The oxygen takes less than 12 minutes to reach as
> high an effective
> > saturation level as is useful. Beyond that the
> body reacts by constricting
> > blood vessels everywhere which limits off gassing,
> by trying to protect
> the
> > lining of the lungs and hence thickens the
> transfer area by adding cells
> and
> > excreting mucous which impedes gas transfer, and
> by causing swelling of
> the
> > lung tissue which further reduces gas exchange
> capability, not to mention
> > scarring and long term damage that in my opinion
> will come back to haunt
> the
> > agencies who teach the baloney.
> >
> >   Returning to a more normoxic ppo2 will reverse
> these effects. However,
> if
> > you do not return soon enough, the effects take a
> lot longer to reverse.
> The
> > big and important thing here is not to depend on
> reversing this action,
> but
> > to preempt it and keep it from fully developing
> and thus make what does
> > occur easier to reverse and at the same time
> actually improve your off
> > gassing by opening the capillaries back up and
> allowing gas to escape from
> > the tissues into the blood. This "toggling" back
> and forth has proven to
> be
> > the absolute best method of gas use in
> decompression. DIR deco.
> >
> >   If you fail to do this at any point in the deco
> using high ppo2s you
> will
> > merely be holding gas in tissues which may expand
> before it can be removed
> > as you move up - another massive flaw in all of
> the existing deco
> programs.
> >
> >   As you get higher in the water column, off
> gassing is more safely and
> > effectively achieved by the moving the gradient
> and letting gas bubble
> into
> > the bloodstream and be caught and removed by the
> lungs, but lower down
> this
> > will not work - one more huge flaw in deco
> programs.
> >
> >   You really should look on the WKPP site and read
> some of my profiles and
> > decompressions on the longer dives to see all the
> massive deviations from
> > what is thought to be correct by the agencies.
> >
> >   In fact, I will tell you right now that this is
> just like deep air - the
> > same idiots who fought for their precious deep air
> are the ones who teach
> > the most incorrect deco and theories of deco. The
> same people - give them
> a
> > wide berth in all areas of diving since you can
> NOT teach pigs to sing.
> >
> >   If want real information, come to the proven
> sources.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles Roth [mailto:divr555@ho*.co*]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 2:53 AM
> > To: trey@ne*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
> > Subject: RE: Oxygen Clock
> >
> >
> > Trey,
> > In fear of sounding stupid, yes, I would really
> like to know how you all
> > came up with this. Or at least point me in the
> right direction to find the
> > resources about this.  Thanks.
> >
> > Chuck R
> >
> >
> > >From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
> > >To: "Isaac Callicrate" <icallicrate@ho*.co*>,
> <mjblackmd@ya*.co*>,
> > ><techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> > >Subject: RE: Oxygen Clock
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]