Mike, this is more of your personal hatred nonsense.

I suggest you read the book, "Science In The Extreme" - there are 32 pages
about me and the WKPP. Read two of the National Geographic magazines from
1999 - see what they have to say about this. See the presentations I made
with Dr Hamilton to the UHMS. See the articles written by me with Dr
Doolette on these subjects. I can go on and on, only with facts and figures
rather than hate and mindless venom. We collect data that nobody else in the
scientific community can collect. Check with Chimiak and Johansen at Navy ,
ask them what they found with WKPP. Ask Bruce Weinke if his Los Alamos Lab
tests of our decompression techniques worked or not. Ask Duke University.

Or keep referring to the old wives tales and the slop out of the training
agencies.

Anyone who wants to know how to do it for real knows to come to the WKPP.
That is a fact. There is nobody our there who does not come to us for advice
on extreme diving other than deep air nonsense of other batmanisms.

And, Mike, you keep implying that we have not been forthcoming about diving
accidents and fatalities. You go ahead and name them and I will be glad to
give everyone a full report. Come on, Mike, for once come up with something
that is not just an expression of your resentment. I love talking about this
stuff and debunking it. You will not come back with any accidents or deaths
because then that gives me the chance to take the wind out of your claims.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael J. Black [mailto:mjblackmd@ya*.co*]
>Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 10:23 AM
>To: Isaac Callicrate
>Cc: Aquanaut Mail
>Subject: Re: Oxygen Clock
>
>
>Refreshing to hear a reasoned, intelligent, non-profane, and
>civil response on Techdiver for a change.
>
>The problem with the WKPP and DIR, Isaac, is that they have
>no credibility in the scientific community, and make up their
>own rules as they do their dives.  Their denial of diving
>accidents and fatalities in their ranks is legendary, so
>anything they do to disprove or challenge credible scientific
>data (US Navy, NOAA, DAN) is suspect.  Furthermore they claim
>that those agencies who have done the research and written the
>rules do not stay current with their data, another false claim.
>Add to this the fact that nearly all of them have to shout,
>lie, swear, threaten, and behave like juveniles to stay in an
>argument, and it is clear what the problem is.  They may do some
>impressive diving in their own world, but cannot expect the rest
>of the world to take them seriously.
>
>MJB
>
>--- Isaac Callicrate <icallicrate@ho*.co*> wrote:
>> Im not sure why everyone is harping on who this guy is or what
>he has posted
>> in the past instead of answering his questions.
>> Am I missing something in the charter that says you have to rate
>an answer
>> or that previous posts disqualify you from getting one?
>> Ill give it a shot even though there are probably more informed
>qualified
>> people on this list that should be.
>> I see WKPP as crossing the grey area between recreational and
>working diving
>> (watch out for OSHA, ADC, and USCG). They are performing dives
>where more
>> compartments are saturated than most other recreational
>profiles. They have
>> been diving similar profiles over and over so have built up an amount of
>> historical data combined with some doppler research that they
>have used to
>> make assumptions about their profiles.
>> I dont think anyone can say right or wrong yet. If their people
>arent having
>> DCS manifestations or O2 toxicity issues than I would definately
>say that by
>> being the guinea pig and letting the rest reap the rewards of
>the data they
>> are rising above.
>> Please do the math on a Navy standard TT 6A with 50/50 @ 165' and 100% @
>> 60'. Do it on a Navy single exposure of 100% at 25' for 240
>minutes.  Why
>> havent you e-mailed them? Please CC me when you do. I think it is
>> publicaffairs@ne*.na*.na*.mi*
>> WKPP isnt the only one that challenges theoretical formulas and
>assumptions
>> with historical data. Commercial, military, hyperbaric
>facilities all have
>> modified the standard thinking on the CNS clock.
>> My personal feelings, I wouldnt recommend pushing the clock on a working
>> dive when not required. For recreational dives, there is no need
>to push it
>> when you are having fun. If you use a habitat or a chamber or
>maybe at rest
>> during deco with surface support, the risk is minimized.
>> I dont think that taking breaks off O2 is going to significantly
>effect your
>> susceptibility to a CNS hit. That is speculation and if anyone
>has data to
>> prove otherwise I would love to examine and try to push it
>through to some
>> people.
>> About cumulative pulmonary issues, I would absolutely take breaks every
>> 20-25 min for extended exposures. With increases as neccessary.
>> The only big no-no I see is deco on 100% @ >1.6 w/o a ffm, hat, or in a
>> controlled environment. I dont think WKPP is doing that. I think
>they use a
>> habitat for extended oxygen. Their protocol incorperates breaks
>between O2
>> periods.
>> What data is NOAA basing their CNS clocking off of? Historical
>or Empirical?
>> Do you side with someones calculator or slide rule?
>> For technical diving I think everyone should be taught to do a
>personal risk
>> analysis for Accelerated Deco vs O2 tox.
>> Where do you draw the line? We can use good models for DCS and
>pretty much
>> say if you do this profile you will get bent. O2 clock is more like
>> speeding. Doing 25 is safer than 65 or 100 or 20,000. We dont
>know where you
>> cross the line to get in a guaranteed O2 "accident". We need more data.
>> All said, everyone enjoy your hit, have the ME e-mail me.
>>
>> >From: "Michael J. Black" <mjblackmd@ya*.co*>
>> >To: Aquanaut Mail <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>> >Subject: Oxygen Clock
>> >Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:26:40 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
>http://greetings.yahoo.com
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]