Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Charles Roth" <divr555@ho*.co*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Cc: croth123@ao*.co*
Subject: RE: UNESCO
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:22:34 -0400
THERE'S GOLD IN THEM THA'RE HILLS!

Okay, I've been reading this thread since Mike Barnette started it about a 
week ago. I've got some questions and comments that keep coming to mind 
every time I read this thread. Please understand that these are my 
unqualified opinions as I have no formal and little informal training in 
archeology (underwater or otherwise)or in law.

First off, it seems that no one was all that interested in "cultural 
heritage" until big treasure finds occured. Several times in the past, 
governmental agencies have tried, sometimes successfully and sometimes not, 
to essentially steal the finds of treasure hunters, salvors, etc. Case in 
point is when Mel Fisher found the Atocha and the state came in and tried to 
confiscate all his finds. Now,in reading Article 18, it looks to me like the 
state will be able to walk into Mel's museums (and anyone elses)and 
confiscate everything in them.
Countries that have had no interest in salvaging wrecks  or preserving them 
have been eagerly jumping on this bandwagon. It appears that they see a 
windfall of gold, precious jewels and other items of value just sitting off 
their shores. Now they don't want to risk their own money in finding or 
salvaging these wrecks, but they certainly don't want some private 
individual(s)doing so either. Case in point, Spain has never attempted to 
search for, or in recent years, salvage any of their treasure ships lost in 
the 15th through 18th century but they certainly were quick to step up and 
claim ownership when someone else did.  Several African nations, always in 
want of easy money, have also eagerly supported this Convention. They looked 
around and found that archeologists have been complaining about this for 
years. It was convenient for countries to take up the archeologists "purist" 
view that there should NEVER be any commercial venture attached to an 
excavation be it underwater or on land. They are using this archeology bent 
to legitimize their attempts to protect their pots of gold and UNESCO as 
their instrument to do so.
Please don't get me wrong. I do believe in protecting and displaying our 
heritage.  I would have never been able to go to the Mariner's Museum in 
Newport News and see pieces of the Monitor otherwise. I think that given the 
opportunity, many divers (including myself) would jump at the chance to 
participate in an underwater excavation. To use our diving skills and our 
interest in wrecks to do something productive. Unfortunately, most 
individuals and institutions seem to balk at the price tag of underwater 
excavation therefor it doesn't get funded and the wrecks slowly deteriorate 
away.
Again, this is my humble, uneducated opinon about this.

Chuck R

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]