Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: RDecker388@ao*.co*
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:20:25 EDT
Subject: Re: Re[4]: UNESCO
To: aldo.solari@ho*.se*, techdiver@aquanaut.com, NCtechdivers@sportdiverhq.com

--part1_3d.134b34c6.29078d79_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 10/23/01 10:26:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
aldo.solari@ho*.se* writes:


> .   Wreckers  should  study  basics  in  law,  cultural
> heritage,  social  anthropology  and  archeology. Nobody will get
> killed by going to some seminars, reading some material and doing
> some field work with specialized instructors.
> 

Tell you what, Chief, I studied archeology, the underwater variety to be 
specific, while in college.  I even gave a bit of thought to doing degree 
work in anthropology.  I know several professional archeologists well, 
particularly those specializing in submerged cultureal materials. Wanna hear 
my "enlighted and educated" view of UNESCO?  It stinks.  It will do nothing 
to protect anything worth protecting, will result in a "black market" of 
wreck diving and fishing resulting in the location of potentially culturally 
significant sites going unreported and has the potential to destroy the 
recreational diving industry.

You use passionate, insulting commentary such as "terrorists," "wreck 
grubbers" and "cutural resource killers," yet likely have never been involved 
in an underwater archeological project yourself.  You come off as someone 
lost in the hallowed halls of academia with little or no understading of the 
real world and how it works.  

The fact is, the majority of the wreck divers I know are fairly conciencious 
people.  They aren't about to strip artifacts off of any sites that are 
truely significant cultural resources.  The vast majority of worthwhile sites 
that have been identified have been found and reported by sport divers, not 
professional archeologists.  In contrast, archeologist often are the worst 
hackers/destroyers/treasure hunters that exist.  Take a trip to Port Royal 
Jamaica and see the rotting, rusting, crumbling artifacts left to waste away 
by archeologists due largely to a lack of funding.  These items are of some 
significance and obviously would be better cared for if in the hands of a few 
"wreck gutters," who would conserve and display them, instead of in the hands 
of professional archeologists!

Here's a thought.  You want to protect all the wrecks laying in your 
country's sovereign waters, go for it.  However, if you want to muddle in the 
territorial waters of other countries, thanks but no thanks, we'll keep care 
of our own.

(I'm not even going to touch the nonsense you put forward concerning fishing, 
degradation of fish stocks, etc.  A six year old with a kindergarten 
education would recognize that for a crock of bull).


your wrote--------

Art, there are three points I would like to clarify:

(1). There are international guidelines (given by UNESCO) for the
concept  of  "cultural/natural heritage" on both sea and land. In
principle,  everything  *is*  cultural/natural  heritage  unless
declared  otherwise. And this goes beyond the interest of many of
those divers who "take a piece home" (ie. deny to others the very
same sites where they themslves liked to dive);

(2).  Combination  of  scuba gear + spear fishing is forbidden in
many  countries. The reason is very clear: spear fishing combined
to  scuba  gear  imply  the local extinction of many coastal fish
species.  A  well  of  scientific  (exclusion)  studies have been
conducted on this in the Mediterranean; even the sole presence of
divers (who just watch) is known to disturb many species.


(3).  Mixing  up  spear  fishing  and trawling is demagogy: spear
fishing  is  aimed  at  coastal species while trawling is done on
demersal  or  pelagic species at a minimum of 5 km off the shore.
The  species  are  different. While trawling is known to collapse
fish populations so does spear fishing in coastal systems.

The  level  of education in the diver population is low both here
and  in  the US. Training is solely technical, quality is bad and
it  lacks  several  subjects  which are highly significant. There
should be course work at university level for those interested in
a  diving  license.  The  University  of  Barcelona  (Spain), for
instance,  has  started  such  couses  and  it  is  a  very  fine
initiative.   Wreckers  should  study  basics  in  law,  cultural
heritage,  social  anthropology  and  archeology. Nobody will get
killed by going to some seminars, reading some material and doing
some field work with specialized instructors.

In  the  US,  course work is always expensive. However, you could
talk to many people from public universities who -I am sure- will
be  more  than  glad  to  talk you through 4-5 seminars on diving
related aspects for free.

Cheers,

----
aldo.solari@ho*.se* (fisheries biologist)
Home page, www.ccbb.ulpgc.es/fish-ecology/solaris
----


--part1_3d.134b34c6.29078d79_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  COLOR="#0000ff" SIZE=2
FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Verdana" LANG="0">In a message dated 10/23/01 10:26:03
PM Eastern Daylight Time, aldo.solari@ho*.se* writes:
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"
FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid;
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">.   Wreckers
 should  study  basics  in  law,  cultural
<BR>heritage,  social  anthropology  and  archeology.
Nobody will get
<BR>killed by going to some seminars, reading some material and doing
<BR>some field work with specialized instructors.
<BR></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"
FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#0000ff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"
FACE="Verdana" LANG="0">
<BR>Tell you what, Chief, I studied archeology, the underwater variety to be
specific, while in college.  I even gave a bit of thought to doing degree
work in anthropology.  I know several professional archeologists well,
particularly those specializing in submerged cultureal materials. Wanna hear my
"enlighted and educated" view of UNESCO?  It stinks.  It will do
nothing to protect anything worth protecting, will result in a "black market"
of wreck diving and fishing resulting in the location of potentially culturally
significant sites going unreported and has the potential to destroy the
recreational diving industry.
<BR>
<BR>You use passionate, insulting commentary such as "terrorists," "wreck
grubbers" and "cutural resource killers," yet likely have never been involved
in an underwater archeological project yourself.  You come off as someone
lost in the hallowed halls of academia with little or no understading of the
real world and how it works.  
<BR>
<BR>The fact is, the majority of the wreck divers I know are fairly
conciencious people.  They aren't about to strip artifacts off of any
sites that are truely significant cultural resources.  The vast majority
of worthwhile sites that have been identified have been found and reported by
sport divers, not professional archeologists.  In contrast, archeologist
often are the worst hackers/destroyers/treasure hunters that exist.  Take
a trip to Port Royal Jamaica and see the rotting, rusting, crumbling artifacts
left to waste away by archeologists due largely to a lack of funding.
 These items are of some significance and obviously would be better cared
for if in the hands of a few "wreck gutters," who would conserve and display
them, instead of in the hands of professional archeologists!
<BR>
<BR>Here's a thought.  You want to protect all the wrecks laying in
your country's sovereign waters, go for it.  However, if you want to
muddle in the territorial waters of other countries, thanks but no thanks,
we'll keep care of our own.
<BR>
<BR>(I'm not even going to touch the nonsense you put forward concerning
fishing, degradation of fish stocks, etc.  A six year old with a
kindergarten education would recognize that for a crock of bull).
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>your wrote--------
<BR>
<BR>Art, there are three points I would like to clarify:
<BR>
<BR>(1). There are international guidelines (given by UNESCO) for the
<BR>concept  of  "cultural/natural heritage" on both sea and land.
In
<BR>principle,  everything  *is*  cultural/natural
 heritage  unless
<BR>declared  otherwise. And this goes beyond the interest of many of
<BR>those divers who "take a piece home" (ie. deny to others the very
<BR>same sites where they themslves liked to dive);
<BR>
<BR>(2).  Combination  of  scuba gear + spear fishing is
forbidden in
<BR>many  countries. The reason is very clear: spear fishing combined
<BR>to  scuba  gear  imply  the local extinction of many
coastal fish
<BR>species.  A  well  of  scientific  (exclusion)
 studies have been
<BR>conducted on this in the Mediterranean; even the sole presence of
<BR>divers (who just watch) is known to disturb many species.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>(3).  Mixing  up  spear  fishing  and trawling
is demagogy: spear
<BR>fishing  is  aimed  at  coastal species while
trawling is done on
<BR>demersal  or  pelagic species at a minimum of 5 km off the
shore.
<BR>The  species  are  different. While trawling is known to
collapse
<BR>fish populations so does spear fishing in coastal systems.
<BR>
<BR>The  level  of education in the diver population is low both
here
<BR>and  in  the US. Training is solely technical, quality is bad
and
<BR>it  lacks  several  subjects  which are highly
significant. There
<BR>should be course work at university level for those interested in
<BR>a  diving  license.  The  University  of
 Barcelona  (Spain), for
<BR>instance,  has  started  such  couses  and
 it  is  a  very  fine
<BR>initiative.   Wreckers  should  study  basics
 in  law,  cultural
<BR>heritage,  social  anthropology  and  archeology.
Nobody will get
<BR>killed by going to some seminars, reading some material and doing
<BR>some field work with specialized instructors.
<BR>
<BR>In  the  US,  course work is always expensive. However,
you could
<BR>talk to many people from public universities who -I am sure- will
<BR>be  more  than  glad  to  talk you through 4-5
seminars on diving
<BR>related aspects for free.
<BR>
<BR>Cheers,
<BR>
<BR>----
<BR>aldo.solari@ho*.se* (fisheries biologist)
<BR>Home page, www.ccbb.ulpgc.es/fish-ecology/solaris
<BR>----
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_3d.134b34c6.29078d79_boundary--
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]