Hi, Jim, That's the kind of report I've been looking for. The split is designed to reduce the energy wasted pushing water up and down with a flutter kick. The frog kick is more like a oar pushing on the water, so your results were inevitable. Based on what David reports on using them in the Northwest, it seems that the floppy split fins have a fairly narrow "power curve" and would need to be matched to a particular rig and diver. If the entanglement issue can be resolved, a center vented fin with replaceable battens like the Wenoka Reeflex might work out in some applications. Jim, I hate to cut you out of a commission, but since I already have more fins than shoes, I'll have to take a pass on your kind offer. :) Don ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Holcomb <jimholcomb@x-*.co*> To: Techdiver <Techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: 05 August, 2001 21:47 Subject: Re: Split fins > Split fins were made for people with a high air consumption rate diving on > shallow reefs. I tested a couple pairs of those things when they first came > out. They allow for less work (meaning less air consumption) traveling > around in a non-current type environment. From a technical standpoint they > are useless. Most cave/wreck divers use the frog kick. When I attempted to > use the frog kick with them I went absolutely nowhere (must be the physics > of the design?) With a standard open water flutter or modified flutter you > DO move with less effort but not as far - so is that less effort or not? > But at twice the price I would be glad to sell you a pair <big grin>. Call > me at the store. <another big grin>. > Jim > From: "Don Burke" <donburke56@ne*.ne*> > > > From: Joe Citelli <joe@po*.co*> > > > > > How could a fin with less surface area and rigidity possibly generate > more > > > thrust in the water than a fin with greater surface area and rigidity? > > > > If the smaller fin puts less water in the wrong direction, less surface > area > > is needed. > > > > If the flex in a fin causes more water to go straight back, the flex is a > > good thing. > > > > An extension of your argument is the use of a 4 by 8 sheet of plywood on > > each foot. Since that doesn't seem to work very well, perhaps the > > hydrodynamic problem is a bit more involved than just surface area and > > rigidity. > > > > > People like them because they are easy to kick with. > > > > Perhaps > > > > > But you travel less distance. > > > > That isn't how I interpret the test results I have seen. > > > > > Personally, I'd rather kick hard once to cover a given distance > > > than kick easy three times. > > > > I doubt the ratio is that high. In any case, isn't the figure of merit > gas > > consumption for distance traveled? > > > > > The manufacturers simply had nothing to sell so they made this up. > > > > Perhaps, although the test results do look encouraging. > > > > > Funny how people that buy this kind of stuff typically keep going back > to > > the > > > stuff in their garage that works. > > > > I'm watching all of this. They have my attention. Perhaps one day > they'll > > get my money. > > > > The entanglement issue needs to be addressed. I touch my line with a fin > at > > least once a dive and don't need anything else to wrap the line around. > > > > I saw a fin with vents down the center in one of the magazines and perhaps > > that is the wave of the future. > > > > The best performers seem to have the blade bent downward in a sort of > > "ballerina set." It would not surprise me to find that much improvement > > comes from that. > > > > Don Burke > > Chesapeake, Virginia ---------------------------------------------------- NetZero Platinum Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97 -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]