Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: Terry
To: McCracken <terrym@it*.ns*.co*.au*>
Subject: Re: Vairible O2 non-rebreather
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 15:09:20 +22305714 (HST)
> 	Could the experts tell me how much this would reduce your deco
> obligation by, and wether this a viable idea.

I took a typical deep air profile of 180 fsw for 30min.  Here are some
total decompression times: (NOTE: DO NOT TRY TO EXTRAPOLATE DECOMPRESSION
SCHEDULES FROM THESE VALUES!!!!)

BREATHING GAS              TOTAL DECO
-------------------------------------
Air all the way:              2:10

Air with O2 at 20&10fsw:      0:54

Air on bottom, NNI from
  130-20, O2 at 20&10:        0:45

Air on bottom, NNI from
  130-70, 50/50 from 70-20,
  O2 at 20&10:                0:40

Constant PO2 at 1.4 ATA:      0:37
--------------------------------------

As you can see, the biggest advantage is O2 at the shallowest
decompression stops.  After that, trying to keep a constant PO2 has
diminishing returns.  I think you're better-off sticking with open circuit
all the way, with a gas switch to O2 at 20fsw to more-than cut the deco
time in half.  Switching to NNI at 130fsw would shave another 10 minutes
off.  After that, I think the risks and complexities associated with
trying to blend constant PO2 in Open Circuit are not worth the benefits of
a few minutes decompression time savings.

Aloha,
Rich

deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]