Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: "techdiver(a)opal.com" <techdiver@opal.com>
Subject: Clarification on the manifolds
From: <AHDNN1A.DDRAKE01@ed*.co*>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 16:11:54 -0500
From: ddrake01
The over pressure disks were changed in the 200 bar Swiss valves, not the
Sherwood which are great valves. I'm just not happy with the risk of over-
presurizing. What happens when the tank or manifold fails first?

Lawyer: Mr. tank owner, this 16 yr. old boy was killed because you violated
Federal law when you defeated the SAFETY RELIEF device in a valve that is under
rated for the tank's legal rated pressure which is itself a violation of
Federal law.  This boy's LIFE was lost so you could get a few extra MINUTES of
bottom time????? Those sure were expensive minutes Mr. tank owner, they'll cost
you a few million--or whatever you got...

The Sherwood socket I had seemed to have a more depth to it than other
300 bar DIN sockets.  I beleive this is due to the design where the air comes
into the socket. The metal on the back side of the socket ( where the dimple
would be if it were a yoke or A clamp ) seemed to be extra thick compared to
other high pressure valves.

Motivation: I'd rather have the ability to switch between types of regulators
and have 300 bar DIN valves with double O rings w/o changing bursts disks if
I can.  You know-have my cake and eat it too or "eat my pudding w/o my meat"!
Yes, I know the A clamp wouldn't be good for much past 3000 psi, but I can
always underfill, drain the tanks, or put them in ice-cold Lake Superior water!

Again, does anyone know if the Swiss make a 300 bar manifold?

DAVID DRAKE       AHDNN1A.DDRAKE01@ED*.CO*
ROMULUS, MICHIGAN  EDS/GM POWERTRAIN 8-375-5467 (GM NET)

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]