Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <RDecker388@ao*.co*>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 10:07:00 EDT
Subject: Re: Isolating Manifold Question
To: bruces@sh*.ne*.au*, RDecker388@ao*.co*, rikard.lundgren@sw*.se*
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Bruce,

With all due respect allow me provide a little different perspective to your 
views, item by item.

> The Iso valve is there for what its describes "Isolation", theres no
>  point in having it fully open as it acheives nothing. 

- Scuba valves employ ball-gate valves which are designed to operate properly 
when fully opened.

- A partially closed valve is more susceptable to being bumped off should one 
inadvertantly rub it agaisnt an overhead object.

-  By leaving the valve either all the way on or all the way off there can 
never be any confussion or hesitation concerning which direction to turn the 
valve to achieve the opposite position.


>If you need to
>  isolate a cylinder and are losing gas then the quicker the better.

- Closing a fully open valve takes very little time if the diver is actually 
willing to practice potentially life saving skills.  The amount of gas that 
might be lost in the time difference between closing a partially vs. a fully 
open valve is inconsequential.

    (Take a set of doubles, place the Iso valve in the position you would 
normally operate it, purge a regulator while shutting of the valve.  Note the 
amount of pressure drop that occured.  Do the same with a fully open valve.  
Did a measurable difference of gas escape during one vs. the other?)

>  Remember when this happens every ounce counts. It can be confusing
>  only because the loss of gas is still happening from the failed system
>  half. 

- This confusion could easily lead to a diver opening a partially open valve, 
rather than closing, resulting in even more lost time/gas.  A fully opened 
valve will only turn one way.

>The failed side should still be breathed till exhausted if one can.

- Totally dependent upon the nature of the failure.  If the failure is a 
freeflowing regulator you're better off to switch regs and shut-down the 
failed side.  If the leak is in the mainfold/tank it self, being behind your 
head you may not know which side is the failed side.  In that case breathe 
the reg in your mouth, isolate, then start hunting for the failure.

>  Then hop onto what should be 50% of what you had when the failure
>  occured. 

- Again, dependent upon the regulator you may have much more than 50% of your 
gas available.  The most common failures being a dislodged seal / o-ring 
extrusion at the first-stage to tank interface, or a free flowing reglator.  
Neither of these results in a catstrophic loss of gas nor a need to isolate 
the two sides of the gas supply.  Simply shut-down the valve on the offending 
side, re-open the iso and have access to all your gas.


>The iso should be just cracked open to allow equalisation and shut
>  with the minimum of effort, come on think about this and get your head out 
>  of the rubbish the agencies print. 

- I could care less what the agencies put in print, a valve is either open or 
shut. No in-between BS.  It is fairly easy to realize that partially 
open/shut valves have accounted for more incidents in this sport than fully 
openining the valves ever will.  I've yet to ever hear anyone tell of single 
incident where a fully open valve played a role.  Yet I've heard many stories 
concerning how partially open/closed valves created problems.  There is no 
room for "ifs, ands, buts or maybes" in diving.  The valve is either on or 
off, no compromises.

Half-assed, short cut approaches to solving non-problems such as only partly 
opening the iso valve are simply the result of those that are too lazy to 
practice important skills to the point of perfection.  Lazy 
divers/instructors perpetuate the myth that this is an important safety 
protocol and others, knowning no better, follow that myth.  Then, when faced 
with the truth, they cling to their ways defiantely.

A complete valve shut-down drill can be completed in 10 seconds or less if 
the diver practices and hones their ability.  The quanity of gas lost in 10 
seconds is so miniscule that your fate is sealed anyway should that be too 
much of a loss.

Valve and manifold failures are so rare as to be worthy of being rated as 
non-problems.  Take reasonable care of your equipment and you'll never 
experience a catstrophic failure of a valve/manifold.  At worse you may get a 
slow leak, creating a small steady stream of bubbles. That will not result in 
any meaningful compromise of your gas supply in the first place.  If you have 
a small o-ring/seal failure resulting in a slow leak, turn the dive and head 
home.  It's not that big of deal.

Again, the most common failures associated with the breathing gas system are:

- Failure at the 1st stage/valve interface (dislodging or o-ring 
extrusion/failure)
- Free flowing regulator
- Hose rupture
- Burst disk failure

None of these failures needs be particularly life threatening, nor will they 
result in a catstropic loss of gas.  Simply shut-down the compromised side 
and head for home. Among these the most serious, and also easiest to prevent, 
is likely the burst disk failure.  The U.S. cave diving community solved that 
issue many, many years ago.  For European divers it is not even an issue.


>It is not common sense to have the iso valve fully open. Common sense is 
being >familiar with the on/off directions of all valves and your buddies 
valves as well.

Common sense dictates that equipment be used in the manner that is was 
designed to be used.  Scuba cylinder valves are designed to be used either 
fully open or fully shut.

Common sense dictates that the diver conduct risk analysis of their gear, 
recognizing those features that are highly subject to life-threatening 
failures and backing those up, while also identifying those potential 
failures that are very unlikely and also not likely to be life-threatening in 
nature. 


The time difference in shutting down a fully vs. partially open valve is so 
miniscule that you either have an adequate gas supply to survive or not.  
Fully open or partially open WILL NOT have a meaningful impact on the outcome.

Regards,

Bob Decker
www.SportDiverHQ.com
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]