Bill, since the DIR philosophy is to keep it as simple as possible, I have to ask. Is there any reason why you think routing under the arm is necessary or advantageous? If not, then you have your answer, the reason you don't use a longer hose and route under the arm is because you don't need the extra length, so why bring it? I've been very happy with the regulator hoses configured as per DIR, and during an out of air situation (before I had a chance to practice this!!!!!!!!) it was no big deal to donate the long hose and find the backup reg. It was right under my nose....literally! <bigvon@be*.ne*> wrote: ~ >Need some DIR reasoning here. >Why is running the secondary regulator hose under your arm, rather than over >the shoulder not acceptable? Under the arm would seem to be out of the way, >low profile, and reduce drag and risk of entanglement. >Bill > > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Paul B. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]