Marv I guess I am confused. I have no problem with the steel & dry vs. AL80 & wet concept. I have a physical space/foot print problem. How can two sets of 2xAL80 take the same foot print as 1 set of 2x104s? Al80 are ~7.25" & 104s are ~8" in diameter. Please explain this space compression. David >-----Original Message----- >From: Marv [mailto:ajmarve@ba*.ne*] >Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:10 PM >To: Kevin Connell >Cc: Paul Braunbehrens; George Irvine; allysonclagett@ea*.ne*; >'Chris Elmore'; techdiver@aquanaut.com >Subject: Re: DIHUL, was: Fins question > > >no. > >The 80s are smaller tanks than the 104s, i have a set of each in the >garage and have dove both with dry suit and full dir regalia. >even with >an 80 stage and a 40 deco bottle, the dbl 80 rig is not as >cumbersome as >the 104s, and i am talking in-water, not dry land. As far as >deck space >goes i can carry two sets in the same footprint as one set of 104s. >Whats not to love. > >Marv > >Kevin Connell wrote: > >> aren't three eighties more weight (and more bulky) than two 104's? >> We would need an extra stage on a couple of the dives we do. >> >> At 11:37 PM 2/25/2001 -0500, Marv wrote: >> >>> Paul, >>> >>> i just got finished reviewing the available archived posts and i >>> remain convinced that dbl al 80s are a faster slicker set up for >>> ocean diving.While 104s give you you a nice package one can acheive >>> the buoyancy equivalent with 80s and weights for ocean and have a >>> rig with no down side that presents less of a hassle while >transiting >>> the entry/exit portion of the dive.. >>> >>> That being said, stick with the 104s until you finish the training, >>> so you wont have problems with the northwest mafia and then you can >>> get some 80s on the cheap and compare for yourself; since >youll have >>> the manifold all youll need is twos 80s and $75 diverite bands . >>> >>> Apparently its one of those things you dont believe until you try, >>> kind of like the rest of DIR...................................... >>> >>> best, >>> >>> Marv >>> >>> Paul Braunbehrens wrote: >>> >>>> I just ordered double 104's based on the idea that this is >the ideal >>>> setup. I'm going to be using this *a lot* off a small >boat. Should >>>> I get something else instead? >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> George Irvine wrote: >>>> ~ >>>> >>>>> I keep saying it - weight yourself so that with little or no gas >>>>> you can >>>>> hover at ten feet, and with full gas you can swim up with no >>>>> inflation by >>>>> dropping something. >>>>> That covers it. >>>>> For tank choice in ocean, big heavy tanks are dangerous boat >>>>> diving, so are >>>>> not my first choice. I'd rather add a stage and dive it dry , >>>>> leaving my >>>>> back gas intact. >>>>> Cave diving is different in that you need more gas to go farther >>>>> and the >>>>> decompression is in a safe environment,not open sea with all its >>>>> vagaries. >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Marv" <ajmarve@ba*.ne*> >>>>> To: "George Irvine" <kirvine@sa*.ne*> >>>>> Cc: <allysonclagett@ea*.ne*>; "'Kevin Connell'" >>>>> <kevin@co*.ne*>; >>>>> "'Paul Braunbehrens'" <Bakalite@ba*.co*>; "'Chris Elmore'" >>>>> <elmorec@at*.ne*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:28 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: DIHUL, was: Fins question >>>>> >>>>>> Geroge, >>>>>> I am more or less the instigator of this mess , and I >would like >>>>>> to just >>>>>> bring a couple of things more into focus. >>>>>> If you had limited funds< like Paul does> which tank would you >>>>>> buy, the >>>>>> al80s or the 104s, if you were only diving ocean? >>>>>> Why exactly is the 80 the "tank of choice" for the ocean? Is >>>>>> there some >>>>>> reason besides buoyancy and cost? >>>>>> What is more important on a deco dive inthe ocean, ability to >>>>>> ultimately >>>>>> surface by ditching weight to become positive or remaining >>>>>> beneath the >>>>>> deco ceiling by other means< buddy support divers bring >gas, etc> >>>>>> I am thinking that your primary concern in the ocean >is drowning, >>>>>> followed by inert gas concerns. Which is more or less important >>>>>> to the >>>>>> dir diver in the ocean? >>>>>> Did i misquote you or miss some context in your original >>>>>> article<where i >>>>>> quoted from your gear config piece re al 80s in the >ocean, which >>>>>> is in >>>>>> the morass below.> ? >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Marv >>>>>> George Irvine wrote: >>>>>> > Think of it this way , Allyson: whatever you are wearing, you >>>>>> should be >>>>> >>>>> able >>>>> >>>>>> > to stay at ten feet with almost no gas, and you >should be able >>>>>> to swim >>>>> >>>>> up >>>>> >>>>>> > from depth with no inflation of any kind ( by dropping >>>>>> something ). If >>>>> >>>>> you >>>>> >>>>>> > can do that, you are DIR. If not, you are a moron ( not you, >>>>>> Allyson ). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> > From: "Allyson" <allysonclagett@ea*.ne*> >>>>>> > To: "'Kevin Connell'" <kevin@co*.ne*>; "'Marv'" >>>>> >>>>> <ajmarve@ba*.ne*>; >>>>> >>>>>> > "'Paul Braunbehrens'" <Bakalite@ba*.co*> >>>>>> > Cc: "'Chris Elmore'" <elmorec@at*.ne*>; >>>>>> <techdiver@aquanaut.com> >>>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:00 PM >>>>>> > Subject: RE: DIHUL, was: Fins question >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> Hi Marv, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> You're right, George Irvine's "Doing It Right Gear >Configuration" >>>>> >>>>> article >>>>> >>>>>> >> says that for ocean diving "aluminum 80's are the tank of >>>>>> choice." >>>>>> > >>>>>> > However >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> the article also says "in ocean or lake diving, steel tanks >>>>>> should >>>>> >>>>> never >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > be >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> used without a drysuit." >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> So what I surmise from the article is, if you are diving in >>>>>> the ocean >>>>> >>>>> in a >>>>> >>>>>> >> wetsuit, definitely use aluminum 80's--with a wetsuit, never >>>>>> use steel >>>>>> >> tanks. If you are diving a drysuit in the ocean, >using steel >>>>>> tanks is >>>>>> >> acceptable (as you will need less weight elsewhere on your >>>>>> person.) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> ~Allyson >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> >> From: Kevin Connell [mailto:kevin@co*.ne*] >>>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 12:08 AM >>>>>> >> To: Marv; Paul Braunbehrens >>>>>> >> Cc: Chris Elmore; techdiver@aquanaut.com; GUE Mailing List >>>>>> >> Subject: Re: DIHUL, was: Fins question >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Marv, is it DIR because you read something george >wrote (out of >>>>>> >> context) and you happen to use the same equipment? >>>>> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >>>>>> >> Can you come out here and retrain everyone, maybe offer some >>>>>> lectures >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>> >>>>>> >> DIR? We seem to be stroking out big time with steel tanks. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> armchair diving at its finest. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> At 11:37 PM 2/20/2001 -0500, Marv wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> THis is not just a Paul thing but since he brougth >it up, its >>>>>> the >>>>> >>>>> ideal >>>>> >>>>>> >>> place for it. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> If you are diving in the ocean , what is the ideal tank? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> not what tank can you make work or what tank is kind of ok, >>>>>> but what >>>>> >>>>> tank >>>>> >>>>>> >>> is DIR?? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> its the ALUMINUM 80 >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> These tanks are one third the cost of steel >whatevers and one >>>>>> fifth >>>>> >>>>> the >>>>> >>>>>> >>> weight. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> They are the ultimate tank in terms of buoyancy, when >>>>> >>>>> manifolded&doubled >>>>> >>>>>> >>> up with a steel plate for drysuit diving you will >not realize >>>>>> you are >>>>>> >>> wearing tanks, they have more than enuff gas for >most reasonable >>>>> >>>>> dives, >>>>> >>>>>> >>> and they are by definition the dir tank of choice for the >>>>>> ocean. They >>>>> >>>>> are >>>>> >>>>>> >>> easy to dive with a tls 350, c4 14 size light and a weight >>>>>> belt or if >>>>> >>>>> you >>>>> >>>>>> >>> must a v weight. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> check out Georges article on wkpp.org if you doubt >what i am >>>>>> telling >>>>> >>>>> you. >>>>> >>>>>> >>> Its right there in black and white.or read below. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Marv >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> From "Equipment Configuration", G. Irvine, wkpp.org >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> " For ocean, aluminum 80's are the tank of choice. If more >>>>>> gas is >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > needed, >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>> take an aluminum stage, but don't risk your life being over >>>>>> weighted >>>>> >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>> >>> the beginning of the dive. The buoyancy characteristics of >>>>>> aluminum, >>>>>> >>> especially when using helium , are such that a weight belt >>>>>> and or >>>>>> >>> canister light will provide the necessary ballast which can >>>>>> be dropped >>>>>> >>> in an emergency, making the rig only reasonably >negative when >>>>>> full, >>>>>> >>> neutral when empty, but swimable by dropping the weight. " >>>>>> >>> ----George Irvine >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Paul Braunbehrens wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> I already replaced a bunch of stuff, this is not the >>>>>> beginning of >>>>>> >>>> switching to a DIR setup. The DIR tanks cost $900 >and weigh >>>>>> a ton. I >>>>>> >>>> can't stomach it in my pocketbook or knees right now. >>>>>> Someone else >>>>> >>>>> said >>>>> >>>>>> >>>> my tanks will work for now. >>>>>> >>>> Kevin Connell wrote: >>>>>> >>>> ~ >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> So what's the problem paul, you only need to replace your >>>>>> tanks and >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> > your >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> fins. you did way better than I did, I had to replace >>>>>> everything. >>>>>> >>>>> Dry gloves are OK as long as the wrist seal is intact. >>>>>> >>>>> Drysuit is fine. it's compressed. Actually a >nice suit if >>>>>> you ask >>>>> >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You won't need the weights with proper tanks. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> At 11:23 AM 2/20/2001 -0800, Paul Braunbehrens wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris, I've had the twin jets since before I was exposed >>>>>> to DIR. I >>>>>> >>>>>> also have a neoprene drysuit, a set of HP >doubles, and an >>>>>> atomic >>>>>> >>>>>> regulator. Sorry, I just don't have $2k sitting around >>>>>> right now >>>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> change all my gear. I'm trying to figure out what I can >>>>>> use in the >>>>>> >>>>>> tech 1 class, and what I need to change. In the real >>>>>> world you >>>>> >>>>> need >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> > to >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> make some compromises. It's either do the class >with most >>>>>> of the >>>>> >>>>> gear >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I have now, or wait until I have the money to switch all >>>>>> my gear >>>>>> >>>>>> around, and that could be a while. So I"m trying to >>>>>> figure out >>>>> >>>>> what >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> will "work", and what I absolutely have to >replace now. I >>>>>> just >>>>> >>>>> priced >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> the jet fins, they are a minor expense, I'll be >getting them >>>>> >>>>> shortly. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your offer to let me borrow your stuff, BTW, >>>>>> but I've >>>>> >>>>> long >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> since learned that you need to train using your >own gear, >>>>>> if the >>>>>> >>>>>> training is to be worth anything. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just for kicks, here is a list of what I'm using, as you >>>>>> can see >>>>> >>>>> I've >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> already blown a lot of money... >>>>>> >>>>>> PST HP 100 doubles with isolator manifold >>>>>> >>>>>> G250/M20 on a necklace, and Atomic on a 7 ft hose. >>>>>> >>>>>> brass spg. >>>>>> >>>>>> 10 W HID >>>>>> >>>>>> Halcyon integrated weights >>>>>> >>>>>> OMS SS backplate >>>>>> >>>>>> Harness (webbing from EE, the other stuff I had laying >>>>>> around) >>>>>> >>>>>> 2 EE backup lights >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> Diving Concepts compressed neoprene drysuit >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Halcyon 65 lb wing (I have some bondage wings sitting in >>>>>> my garage >>>>> >>>>> in >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> case anyone wants them) >>>>>> >>>>>> Twin jet fins with spring straps (soon to be Jet fins) >>>>>> >>>>>> Halcyon lift bag >>>>>> >>>>>> Halcyon Sausage >>>>>> >>>>>> Dry gloves with ring system (this was a poor choice, but >>>>>> I'm stuck >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> > with >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> it for now). >>>>>> >>>>>> So here is the question really. I just don't have the >>>>>> bucks to >>>>> >>>>> change >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> the drysuit and the tanks right now, and I'm sure those >>>>>> two are the >>>>>> >>>>>> worst offenders. Should I postpone the class until I've >>>>>> changed >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> > those, >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> or should I take the class now? >>>>>> >>>>>> Please advise. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris Elmore wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ~ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul, >>>>>> >>>>>>> George was right, "What are we going to do with >>>>>> you?" I've >>>>> >>>>> been >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> diving >>>>>> >>>>>>> since '68 and a pressure gauge is the only thing that >>>>>> made it past >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > the >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> DIR >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> purge. To clarify: DIR stands for Doing It Right. It >>>>>> doesn't mean >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > Doing >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> It >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Half-assed Until Later. You keep asking questions, >>>>>> getting good >>>>>> >>>>>>> answers then >>>>>> >>>>>>> buying crap anyway. Sign up for a GUE course >and I'll let >>>>>> you >>>>> >>>>> borrow >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> all my >>>>>> >>>>>>> stuff for the week. Geez, put the coffee on. >>>>>> >>>>>>> C. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris Elmore >>>>>> >>>>>>> PalmettoSoft Technologies Corp. >>>>>> >>>>>>> (803) 233-2001 (work) >>>>>> >>>>>>> (803) 348-3055 (mobile) >>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Paul Braunbehrens <Bakalite@ba*.co*> >>>>>> >>>>>>> To: <thomas@ha*.ne*>; Steve Schultz >>>>>> >>>>>>> <se2schul@bl*.ma*.uw*.ca*>; >>>>>> >>>>>>> Stefan Bolka <sbolka@er*.co*> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; GUE Mailing List >>>>>> <quest@gu*.co*> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:59 AM >>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: RE: Fins question >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because I've been diving for a couple of decades, and >>>>>> happen to >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> > have >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> some equipment that I purchased before I was >exposed to >>>>>> DIR. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> DUH! >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thomas Tukker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ~ >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >Hmmm, never seen any of those in Wakulla... >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >Guess you're in for another purchase. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >Why not buy what you see all DIR divers wear >in the first >>>>> >>>>> place, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> that >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> might >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >be a money saving strategy if you have a limited >>>>>> budget to work >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> with >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >TT >>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> From: Paul Braunbehrens >[mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co*] >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:07 AM >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> To: Steve Schultz; Stefan Bolka >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com; GUE Mailing List >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: Fins question >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Steve, that's not my experience. I was also >>>>>> wondering if >>>>> >>>>> the >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> twin >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> jets are DIR, 'cause when I got a dry >suit and had >>>>>> to get >>>>>> >>>>>>>> larger fins >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> I did get the twin jets. As far as how well they >>>>>> work, they >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> work >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> very well. No cramps, and you will move faster. >>>>>> They don't >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> "feel" >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> like you're doing much work, i.e. there isn't much >>>>> >>>>> resistance >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> to work >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> against, but if you compare against known >variables >>>>>> you'll >>>>> >>>>> see >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> that >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> your speed under water has improved. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> I sure hope they're ok, 'cause I'm >already going to >>>>>> blow a >>>>> >>>>> lot >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> of >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >> money on other stuff including the tech1 class, >>>>>> and don't >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > want >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> to >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> have to buy fins as well. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Cheers. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Steve Schultz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> ~ >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >Stefan, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >Data can be manipulated statistically to serve >>>>>> whoever is >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>>> publishing >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >info. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >When you read info about fin efficiency, >see who is >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> > publishing >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> the >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> data, >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >and ask yourself if they have something to gain. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >More importantly, try it yourself in the water. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >I tried the bio-fin a couple years ago >when appollo >>>>> >>>>> sponsored >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> an >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >expedition. I found the fins sucked. I >mean really >>>>>> >>>>>>>> sucked. I dive >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jets >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >and only Jets now. Give me 10 pairs of bio-fins >>>>>> for free, >>>>> >>>>> and >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> I'll >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> still >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >be diving my Jets. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >Whoever said bio-fins are more efficient >probably >>>>>> didn't >>>>> >>>>> have >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> calf >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >muscles, or they sell them. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >BTW, the best DIR equipment list so far >is on the >>>>>> WKPP >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> > website. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> George >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >posted his configuration. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >ss >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Stefan Bolka wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> Ok this is probably gonna get me hurt but... >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> Has anyone thought about the natures >wing, i.e. >>>>>> scubapro >>>>>> >>>>>>>> twin jet >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>fins or Apollo bio fin for DIR. I ask >because I >>>>>> recognize >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> that >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>many of us (like me) do not have >scooters and the >>>>>> test >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> > numbers >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>showing better efficiency sound >encouraging. Do >>>>>> these >>>>> >>>>> work >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> for >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>frog kicks? Could they be used for >tech. and not >>>>>> cave or >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> cavern? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> I am asking because I am trying to >start making >>>>>> a "DIR >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> approved >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>equipment list". yes I have too much >time on my >>>>>> hands and >>>>>> >>>>>>>> figured >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>it makes sense to try and help new divers get >>>>>> into DIR >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>methodologies so I am working on a FAQ. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> If anyone has start a FAQ and not >finished let >>>>>> me know, >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> > I'll >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> help finish it. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> Thanks for the help, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> Stefan. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: >quest-help@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> Paul B. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >quest-help@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul B. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: quest-help@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Paul B. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: quest-help@gu*.co* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to >>>>>> `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >>>>>> >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >>>>> >>>>> `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to >>>>>> `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >>>>>> >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >>>>> >>>>> `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to >>>>>> `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >>>>>> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >>>>>> `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]