I don't think there's any way to know that except to note that Al and his
family are scuba divers. He at least would have more first-hand knowledge of
some of the issues surrounding diving.

I also think he is a better candidate for diving as a whole because of his
long-standing commitment to ecological issues. Issues that directly affect
and ARE affecting cave and technical diving sites around the world.

Since he also has a demonstrably quick technical mind I think he'd be more
likely to understand the complex issues that confront tech divers of all
stripes.

JoeL

> From: "Duff Tom (K1-Sbd/ETS5)" <Tom.Duff@us*.bo*.co*>
> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:26:03 -0500
> To: "'Jim Cobb'" <cobber@ci*.co*>, John Purcell <omegasac@ei*.ne*>,
> Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> Subject: Which candidate would...?
> 
> Which candidate would be more likely to regulate (restrict) our diving?  For
> our own protection of course.  These other issues may be important but this
> question would be more relevant to the list.  I'm not making accusations
> just asking for opinions.  Thanks. 

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]