Affirmative. My information comes from the boss, who was lead gas mixer at NEDU, and a 1st Class Diver for ten years. All that gas comes out of the same tube truck. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: Flank, Bernard <Bernard.Flank@tu*.co*> To: 'Scott' <scottk@hc*.co*>; Capt JT <captjt@mi*.co*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 7:11 AM Subject: RE: clarification was: An the beat goes on and on > FWIW, the Navy's standards for Helium are (from the US Navy Diving Manual): > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- > 4-3.3 Diver's Breathing Helium. Helium used for diver's breathing gas shall > meet Military Specification, MIL-P-27407B Propellant Pressurizing > Agent Helium, Type I Gaseous Grade B, Respirable Helium. The purity > standards are contained in Table4-4. > > Table 4-4. Diver's Compressed Helium Breathing Purity Requirements. > Constituent Specification > Helium (percent by volume) 99.997% > Moisture (water vapor) 7 ppm (max) > Dew Point (not greater than) -78°F > Hydrocarbons (as Methane) 1 ppm (max) > Oxygen 3 ppm (max) > Nitrogen + Argon 5 ppm (max) > Neon 23 ppm (max) > Hydrogen 1 ppm (max) > Reference: Military Specification MIL-PRF-27407B > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- > > Acceptable certification of this gas purity is unlikely to be available with welding grade He. Doesn't mean the He isn't just as good - just means it's not been documented. > > Using Navy standards to discuss non-military diving may be comparing apples and oranges. > > B.L. Flank > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott [mailto:scottk@hc*.co*] > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:00 AM > To: Capt JT; techdiver@aquanaut.com; Trey > Subject: Re: clarification was: An the beat goes on and on > > > > JT wrote: > > > > The > > only > > > draw back is what the shop has to pay for the He and then it is past on > to > > > the diver, if it was not for the "Lawyers" who would surely say it is > > > unsafe in court to make a buck , everyone would be using welding gas. > > I think this is a bullshit issue, easily shot in the ass. > > As far as I know, there is no *law* saying you must use USP gas for diving, > the Navy certainly doesn't. I have gas blender shingles from IANTD and TDI, > and both texts suggest very strongly that USP be used, but I am aware of no > legal requirement. I will concede right now that I could be wrong here, and > if I am, would someone with the dope please post it, code and all. > > With O2, its remotely possible for a welding shop with crap equipment (no > check valves) and idiots at the torches, to back fill acetylene into an O2 > bottle. Even so, the bottles are evacuated before filling, or we would have > some gas suppliers with holes in their buildings. No such problem exists > with He. He is used as a shield gas for Tungsten Inert Gas welding (TIG), > and is *never* (in my experience) connected to any system that has another > gas connected to it, least of all a flammable gas, as He is inert. Any > contaminants in the He would seriously affect weld quality, and since He is > used to weld exotic metals (spelled "$$$$") used mostly in Aerospace, I have > no problems what so ever with using industrial He. The chances of a gas > supplier getting sued for selling bad gas, and causing an airplane with 100 > people to fall screaming to their deaths, is much more likely than a suit > involving SCUBA divers. > > We use ABO and industrial grade He. > > Scott > > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]