Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: "Paul Braunbehrens" <Bakalite@ba*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: 80/20 nonsense
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 08:17:02 -0400
OFF GASSING

 You see, this is EXACTLY why I hate dealing with idiots: you have no clue ,
but want to get in my face. The fact is, and this goes for the idiot "guy"
and the other punk, low ox breaks are a necessary part of efficient
OFFGASSING while they are merely advertised as a method of reducing
pulmonary toxicity and damage, and are necessary throughout the
decompresion, not just during the oxygen phase - they REDUCE the
decomprssion time, genius, the IMPROVE the offgassing results, and they are
therefore not counted as no deco time like the idiots morons told you . I
will NOT tell you why, after this bullshit.

I have been over and over the entire reasoning , logic and physiology of
this in several articles and posts, but you don't believe me, you instead
believe some roofer dive instructor or dyslexic moron who does no diving
instead of me. Do not expect me to waste five seconds now doing it again at
your "demand".

I will say that successful decompression uses a combination of models and
theories combined with an understanding of physiology and practical
experience to explain or "validate" what we have come to find works. I will
not waste my time on here after being attacked by blubbering goobs and nasty
little idiots . I'll save the good information for those who approach me
properly.

You tell me, or should I say I "demand" that you show me the last time you
did 7 hours at 300 feet and decompressed out in 8.5 hours with perfect
results, and have the Doppler and blood test to prove it, asshole. Then
let's "compare notes".


Trey wrote:

>  lets talk about what WORKS, and
>what does not.

OK, let's!

How is it that the air breaks are not accounted for.  I'd like some
evidence that this does not make any difference, before I risk
getting bent.  I'd like to see actual dive profiles, % incidences of
the bends, doppler results etc.  I know you have a ton of experience,
but would you base something like this on something that someone
said, or would you demand some evidence?  In the end it's not theory,
it's your body.

Thanks.

--
Paul Braunbehrens mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co*
http://www.daw-mac.com Mailing list for digital audio on the mac

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]