Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Tim Ross" <diverse@un*.on*.ca*>
To: "Trey" <trey@ne*.co*>, "Jeffrey Swann" <swanncruz@ta*.ne*.au*>
Cc: "techdiver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: WKPP stories and why the OMS manifold is not used by us
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:25:47 -0500
I had an OMS manifold years ago. Threw it out. Too badly designed to sell.
OMS is not welcome in my shop.

Tim
Diverse-Tek
----- Original Message -----
From: Trey <trey@ne*.co*>
To: Jeffrey Swann <swanncruz@ta*.ne*.au*>
Cc: techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 9:19 AM
Subject: WKPP stories and why the OMS manifold is not used by us


> Jeff, the stories are on the wkpp.org site. The recent dive at 16,905 was
> actually more interesting then the 18 or the 19, since it is going tunnel
> and we actually videoed the dive.
>
> You can guess that we have come a long way in our sophistication with this
> since JJ and I now are able to do more distance two man and video it at
the
> same time with HID and Digital. We also have a High Definition video of A
> Tunnel, which involved taking a $600,000 camera to 300 feet - that was a
> real milestone in our gear confidence.
>
> The OMS manifold is a piece of shit in my opinion. I do not allow it in
the
> WKPP. Where do we start? The thing is fixed center, as opposed to the
> spinning capability of the Sea Elite ( aka Scuba Pro, Dive Rite, Halcyon,
> etc ) - if you hit something the others will spin the center, and all that
> happens is either both sides tighten or loosen, rather than one loosening
> and one tightening ( the others are  reverse threaded on one side ), if it
> could move at all ( rather than just breaking the knob off or worse ). The
> OMS fits only one way - no adjustment. It has face seals - a major NO NO.
If
> you drop the tanks or hit something it is skewed against the "seal" - not
> the case with the others - they will tolerate a huge shift. The OMS is the
> old style of fittings like the 30 year old manifolds. I looked at one the
> other day and got disgusted after I took it apart. It is so suboptimal,
that
> it is eliminated from an serious consideration before you would even get
any
> further into it. Why by a suboptimal  piece of shit made by people who in
my
> opinion are clueless about dive gear, when you can get optimal manifolds
> from so many other sources, like Dive Rite, or Halcyon, or Sea Elite or
> Scuba Pro? You would really have to be an uniformed moron to buy one of
> these in my opinion.
>
> Jeff, I have been over this so many times .
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Swann <swanncruz@ta*.ne*.au*>
> To: trey@ne*.co* <trey@ne*.co*>
> Date: Friday, June 30, 2000 9:48 AM
> Subject: Re: DIR Rig
>
>
> >Any chance of an answer,
> >Jeff
> >Dear George,
> >I missed the second half of 18,000 +, if you still have it on your
server.
> >Also would you mind giving me a quick wrap up on the problems of OMS
> >manifolds.
> >I thought it was just the knobs.
> >Always appreciate your thoughts.
> >Nice photos on the wkpp site by the way.
> >regards,
> >Jeff of Darwin.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]