John McMillan wrote: > > I read a lot of crap in the many posts that have been presented over the > last few days regarding weighting. Most of the suggestions have been down > right bloody dangerous, stupid, and idiotic. Hey guys what happened to > keeping it simple. We should weight ourselves with out tanks harness etc > attached, just negative. if we are still negative with the tanks and harness > etc on then we are correctly weighted. Using the traditional weight belt is > the most effective way of doing this. Have a bloody good think about why you > should be weighted this way before you make any comments. The guys that want > to wear tank weights etc all over the place have a think about buoyancy > control if you have to take your gear off in water at depth. If and when the > shit hits the fan and you have to do this with weights all over your gear > "good luck". Johnny, I think, even though bits of what you say might have merit, that you have just created a hornet's nest. I'll cast the first stones: are we talking trilam or wetsuit? Twin or singles? Steels or Al? Open ocean without penetration? Open ocean with penetration? Cave? Or are we talking what _you_ do in _your_ neck of the woods? Christian -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]