Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <TGunther@co*.co*>
Subject: RE: 104's AND 95's
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com, quest@gu*.co*
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 13:40:03 -0700

List:

I promised a few individuals to post the answers to why the 104's are preferred
once I had them compiled.   Here is what I have received so far:

     1.  Are beefier tanks and can take more abuse (as in overfills to 3500).
     2.  Balance better as the longer tank does not focus so much weight near
the head which tends to reduce head down posture.
     3.  Greater volume for deep diving (the 95's are a bit lean for this
purpose) without getting inordinately larger in the 121's.
     4.  Better weighting underwater.
     5.  Are a more comfortable length for sitting down on the ground or in
shallow water without being pulled over
           backwards.  95s are too short and the 120s too long for this purpose.
     6.  It's what the experts (WKPP, SCRET, BSTD) so there must be a good
reason.

If any one has any additional reasons or clarifications please post them as
appropriate.

Thanks,
Tod

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]